Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.7.2-8-g708cc2c
Start time: Thu Oct 3 22:29:29 EDT 2013
End time: Thu Oct 3 22:31:36 EDT 2013
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc dev-5-gb33642e
Start time: Thu Oct 3 22:27:02 EDT 2013
End time: Thu Oct 3 22:29:28 EDT 2013
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
ERROR: Command returned a non-zero exist status (1.7.2-7-ge1d8d8e):
./configure
Start time: Thu Oct 3 21:01:35 EDT 2013
End time: Thu Oct 3 21:02:05 EDT 2013
===
###
### Configuring hwloc distribution tarball
### Sta
ERROR: Command returned a non-zero exist status (9cd3100):
./configure
Start time: Thu Oct 3 21:01:01 EDT 2013
End time: Thu Oct 3 21:01:35 EDT 2013
===
###
### Configuring hwloc distribution tarball
### Startup test
I chatted w/ Brice in IM: the github/open-mpi/hwloc repo ***has been completely
reset*** and now reflects all the correct information.
If you have any clones of the original githib/open-mpi/hwloc repo, either be
*exceedingly* careful in pulling down new stuff, or, probably simpler/better:
just
On Oct 3, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Yes; I replayed on the master, but not v1.7 yet. I'll go do that now...
Ok, I replayed on v1.7 and pushed.
As an added bonus, I figured out where I went wrong and screwed up the original
github/open-mpi/hwloc github repo (I can exp
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> The master branch looks good to me, and the list of branches looks fine too.
Good.
> v1.7 misses the last git commits, but I guess you didn't update it yet.
Yes; I replayed on the master, but not v1.7 yet. I'll go do that now...
--
Jeff Sq
Le 03/10/2013 18:07, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> I did the conversion again, and then added the commits that we've put on
> github since the original conversion (but I squashed most of them). I put
> the resulting repo here:
>
> https://github.com/jsquyres/hwloc-convert-again
>
> Doe
I did the conversion again, and then added the commits that we've put on github
since the original conversion (but I squashed most of them). I put the
resulting repo here:
https://github.com/jsquyres/hwloc-convert-again
Does this look ok to everyone? If so, I can kill the existing
githib
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 03 Oct 2013 18:01:25 +0200, a écrit :
> I have automatically imported the previous debian uploads. I don't
> think we really need to keep the detailed commit, the releases have
> brought small diffs enough.
And that permits to switch to another layout which is nicer to han
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Thu 03 Oct 2013 12:38:05 +0200, a écrit :
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > I can do it (assuming the "hwloc-svn-conversion" git tree it uptodate).
> > But I need somebody to create the ompi/hwloc-debian repo on github and
> > give us credentials.
>
On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> It was likely moved to the attic. If svn2git doesn't find it, that's
> fine, I still have it in my archives in case we ever want it (very
> unlikely).
Ah, ok.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://ww
Le 03/10/2013 12:37, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
>> The only important one is "cuda".
>> Most other branches were merged, or manually applied to trunk, or are
>> obsolete. Maybe just keep "json" and "valarray" in case we ever need to
>> revive them.
> I just sent a mail to Dave; let's see wha
On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> I can do it (assuming the "hwloc-svn-conversion" git tree it uptodate).
> But I need somebody to create the ompi/hwloc-debian repo on github and
> give us credentials.
Done.
> The only important one is "cuda".
> Most other branches were merged,
14 matches
Mail list logo