Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 15:54:55 -0500, a écrit :
> cat a.xml b.xml > c.xml
>
> and then using c.xml directly (which I didn't see how that would work).
> Instead, you're talking about manually stitching multiple XML files together
> under a single , further enclosed under a single "Mis
On Jan 11, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The concatenation would be
>
>
>
>
>
>dmi_board_vendor="" dmi_board_name="" memory_kB="0" huge_page_free="0"
> huge_page_size_kB="0">
>
>
>dmi_board_vendor="" dmi_board_name="" memory_kB="0" huge_page_free="0"
> huge_pag
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 21:27:35 +0100, a écrit :
> Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 15:20:45 -0500, a écrit :
> > > > I'm curious -- what's the definition of cat'ing 2 XML files together?
> > > > Does the 2nd become a subtree of the first?
> > >
> > > No, I mean putting both under a
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 15:20:45 -0500, a écrit :
> > > I'm curious -- what's the definition of cat'ing 2 XML files together?
> > > Does the 2nd become a subtree of the first?
> >
> > No, I mean putting both under a "misc" object for instance.
>
> Can you explain more; maybe provide an
On Jan 11, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Maybe it would be better to add a (void*) on to the object to allow
> > arbitrary 3rd parties to cache information off any given hwloc object.
>
> I.e. the userdata pointer in the hwloc_obj_t structure?
Ummm... right. :-)
(I really need
