On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> Aha! I was never happier to be wrong. :-) Woohoo!
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
No problem. Go smack your partner for not doing their due diligence properly.
:-)
> FWIW, I said that you guys have LGPL-2.1 code, so technically it's sti
Aha! I was never happier to be wrong. :-) Woohoo!
Thanks for the clarification.
FWIW, I said that you guys have LGPL-2.1 code, so technically it's still
correct ;-). But I blame Fortran for this oversight.
-- Pavan
On Sep 6, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Sep 6, 2
