Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-25 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > > ...gah! It looks like we're not setting $hwloc_c_vendor at all. > > Well, that explains it. Let me poke around some more... > > I finally got back to this and added the hwloc_c_vendor checking > stuff in. C

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-24 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > ...gah! It looks like we're not setting $hwloc_c_vendor at all. Well, that > explains it. Let me poke around some more... I finally got back to this and added the hwloc_c_vendor checking stuff in. Can you try any SVN trunk version beyond r38

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Igor Galić, le Wed 07 Sep 2011 00:40:06 +0200, a écrit : > - Original Message - > > Igor Galić, le Tue 06 Sep 2011 18:00:00 +0200, a écrit : > > > > > > And also send the output of > > > > > > > > > > > > lstopo --input "nodes:2 sockets:3 caches:4 cores:5 6" > > > > > > > > > > Stdout: > >

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > Igor Galić, le Tue 06 Sep 2011 18:00:00 +0200, a écrit : > > > > > And also send the output of > > > > > > > > > > lstopo --input "nodes:2 sockets:3 caches:4 cores:5 6" > > > > > > > > Stdout: > > > > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/471341/ > > > > > > And without --ena

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 6, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Igor Galić wrote: >> If you don't want to build from SVN (which requires fairly modern >> autotools versions), you can just wait for the nightly tarball > > We've got those with OpenCSW, but as I'm packaging the software, > I'd rather stick to "stable" versions. > >

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Igor Galić, le Tue 06 Sep 2011 18:00:00 +0200, a écrit : > > > > And also send the output of > > > > > > > > lstopo --input "nodes:2 sockets:3 caches:4 cores:5 6" > > > > > > Stdout: > > > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/471341/ > > > > And without --enable-debug? (Since that option apparently make

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Igor Galić
> > > Uh. > > > > > > Could you re-run it after giving --enable-debug to ./configure? > > > > Tests pass with -g only and with --enable-debug (and with no change > > to > > visibility -- I'll attempt this as next step.) > > Erf. > > > > And also send the output of > > > > > > lstopo --input

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Pavan Balaji
FYI, in MPICH2 we use a custom macro to check for compiler warnings and treat them as errors to get around such problems. http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/mpich2/browser/mpich2/trunk/confdb/aclocal_cc.m4?rev=8279#L11 Ugly, but works. -- Pavan On 09/06/2011 09:13 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > > Ah, it looks like we got around this in OMPI by explicitly checking > > to see if the compiler vendor is Sun. Terrible! Let me see about > > back-porting these changes from OMPI... > > I did some internal cle

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Igor Galić, le Tue 06 Sep 2011 17:10:04 +0200, a écrit : > - Original Message - > > Igor Galić, le Tue 06 Sep 2011 14:48:07 +0200, a écrit : > > > > Assertion failed: !obj, file hwloc_get_obj_inside_cpuset.c, line > > > > 40 > > > > /bin/bash: line 5: 20986 Abort (core dum

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > Igor Galić, le Tue 06 Sep 2011 14:48:07 +0200, a écrit : > > > Assertion failed: !obj, file hwloc_get_obj_inside_cpuset.c, line > > > 40 > > > /bin/bash: line 5: 20986 Abort (core dumped) > > > ${dir}$tst > > > FAIL: hwloc_get_obj_inside_cpuset >

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Ah, it looks like we got around this in OMPI by explicitly checking to see if > the compiler vendor is Sun. Terrible! Let me see about back-porting these > changes from OMPI... I did some internal cleanup on that configury test and committed i

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Igor Galić, le Tue 06 Sep 2011 14:48:07 +0200, a écrit : > > Assertion failed: !obj, file hwloc_get_obj_inside_cpuset.c, line 40 > > /bin/bash: line 5: 20986 Abort (core dumped) > > ${dir}$tst > > FAIL: hwloc_get_obj_inside_cpuset Uh. Could you re-run it after giving --enable-de

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > From the config.log: > > configure:8175: checking if /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc supports -fvisibility > configure:8193: /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -o conftest -xO3 -m32 -xarch=v8 > -fvisibility=hidden -I/opt/csw/include -m32 -xarch=v8 -L/opt/csw/lib > conftes

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Igor Galić
> > The failing test (i386): > > PASS: hwloc_get_next_obj_covering_cpuset > Assertion failed: !obj, file hwloc_get_obj_inside_cpuset.c, line 40 > /bin/bash: line 5: 20986 Abort (core dumped) > ${dir}$tst > FAIL: hwloc_get_obj_inside_cpuset > PASS: hwloc_get_shared_cache_coverin

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > On Sep 5, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Igor Galić wrote: > > >> So I think the real issue is why configure might be getting your > >> visibility tests wrong...? Please send your configure > >> stdout/stderr > >> and config.log - we can have a look. > > > > Will do an report

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 5, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Igor Galić wrote: >> So I think the real issue is why configure might be getting your >> visibility tests wrong...? Please send your configure stdout/stderr >> and config.log - we can have a look. > > Will do an report back. Excellent; many thanks. > Another thing:

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-05 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > I do not believe your diagnosis is correct (but I am not at keyboard > to check). The configure visibility stuff turns on 2 different > things: > > - visibility compiler attributes > - compiler cli flags (fvisibility) > > With your sed, u only disabled the cli opt

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-05 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
I do not believe your diagnosis is correct (but I am not at keyboard to check). The configure visibility stuff turns on 2 different things: - visibility compiler attributes - compiler cli flags (fvisibility) With your sed, u only disabled the cli options, whichight be redundant anyway. But the

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-05 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 04/09/2011 18:26, Igor Galić a écrit : > Hi folks, > > first off: I would've submitted this Bug report via Trac if I could have > done it anonymously. I *tried* to register, but the captcha was impossible > to decipher -- And I can see! I strongly suggest you replace this with > reCaptcha. It ha

[hwloc-devel] Bug-Report: visibility=hiden on Sparc/Sun CC

2011-09-04 Thread Igor Galić
Hi folks, first off: I would've submitted this Bug report via Trac if I could have done it anonymously. I *tried* to register, but the captcha was impossible to decipher -- And I can see! I strongly suggest you replace this with reCaptcha. It has an option to reload the captcha, and an audio opti