Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

- "Samuel Thibault" wrote: > What do you mean by "module support"? http://modules.sourceforge.net/ They make managing multiple software installations on clusters much much easier.. -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Michael Raymond, le Mon 30 Nov 2009 09:56:23 -0600, a écrit : > Software modules, eg on SuSE see the Modules RPM. The way that a lot > of software installations used to be managed was to throw them all under > /usr in the standard directories. Ah, ok, right. (module is so generic a name,

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Software modules, eg on SuSE see the Modules RPM. The way that a lot of software installations used to be managed was to throw them all under /usr in the standard directories. This kept library paths and include in default places but breaks down when you have multiple installations of a

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Michael Raymond, le Mon 30 Nov 2009 09:23:02 -0600, a écrit : > At the moment I'm thinking SLES11 (and RHEL6) RPMs of 0.9.3 / TOT > installed in /opt[/sgi]/hwloc. I'd also add module support. What do you mean by "module support"? Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

I don't know what has been announced and what hasn't, but hwloc nicely solves a problem for us and I intend to make sure that it works on all our hardware. On 20 Nov 2009, at 23:55 , Chris Samuel wrote: Hi Michael, - "Michael Raymond" wrote: Our architecture has

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Hi Michael, - "Michael Raymond" wrote: > Our architecture has blades with two Nehalems on > them, and the blades are connected together in a > CC-NUMA fashion. I've heard on the grapevine that there will be memory only blades too, which will have a Nehalem EX on them but

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Samuel Thibault, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 15:54:43 +0100, a écrit : > Introduce several numagroup types? How many? That's not easy to > answer. Or maybe we can add an "ignore" configuration function that also takes a pair of depth parameters to ignore a range of depths for a given type. Here you

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

NUMAGROUP sounds fine to me. Misc appears to be working for me though and I'd like to start shipping hwloc on all our boxes in the next few months. Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Michael Raymond, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 08:43:10 -0600, a écrit : >> In one pattern I might want to place

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Yes. Here's output from a small one of those with only 2 pre-release blades. Brice Goglin wrote: > Michael Raymond wrote: >> Our architecture has blades with two Nehalems on them, and the blades >> are connected together in a CC-NUMA fashion. Each Nehalem shows up as a >> Node and the

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Michael Raymond wrote: > Our architecture has blades with two Nehalems on them, and the blades > are connected together in a CC-NUMA fashion. Each Nehalem shows up as a > Node and the blades show up as Miscs. So you're running on the Altix UV with Nehalem-EX that SGI announced at SC? Is there

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Michael Raymond, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 08:18:53 -0600, a écrit : > It looks like I spoke too soon on the fix. That solves the problem > but it keeps the Miscs from being created and in some situations I'd > like to keep the Miscs but not the nodes. Oh? In which situation? Can't you just ignore

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Michael Raymond, le Thu 19 Nov 2009 14:33:49 -0600, a écrit : > --- hwloc-0.9.2/src/topology-linux.c 2009-11-03 16:40:31.0 -0600 > +++ hwloc-new//src/topology-linux.c 2009-11-19 14:20:43.630035434 -0600 > @@ -536,6 +536,10 @@ >struct dirent *dirent; >hwloc_obj_t node; > > + if