Re: [hwloc-devel] Fwd: [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r2868

Jiri Hladky, le Mon 06 Dec 2010 18:24:25 +0100, a écrit : > > On the hand, autoconf should be able to detect it, right? > > That's what I meant in my mail and commited the other day, yes. > > > Great! Will it make it into 1.1 release? Yes. Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] Fwd: [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r2868

Jiri Hladky, le Sat 04 Dec 2010 23:16:36 +0100, a écrit : > it's a valid objection. I use only linux with pretty recent version of kernel > and C libraries so I didn't know that strftime has portability issues. Well, I meant that strftime has appeared "only" in susv release 3, i.e. something like

Re: [hwloc-devel] Fwd: [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r2868

Hi Samuel, it's a valid objection. I use only linux with pretty recent version of kernel and C libraries so I didn't know that strftime has portability issues. On the hand, autoconf should be able to detect it, right? Thanks! Jirka On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Samuel Thibault

Re: [hwloc-devel] Fwd: [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r2868

Jiri Hladky, le Fri 03 Dec 2010 11:32:01 +0100, a écrit : > I would recommend to replace ctime with strftime function. Please note that > ctime ignores LC_TIME. strftime on the other hand is using LC_TIME I was wondering. strftime is supported by less operating systems. But we can detect that,

[hwloc-devel] Fwd: [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r2868

Hi Brice, I just realized that my messages has been rejected. Sending it again. Thanks Jirka -- Forwarded message -- From: Jiri Hladky List-Post: hwloc-devel@lists.open-mpi.org Date: Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:30 PM Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn]

[hwloc-devel] Fwd: [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r2868

Hi Brice, I just realized that my messages has been rejected. Sending it again. Thanks Jirka -- Forwarded message -- From: Jiri Hladky List-Post: hwloc-devel@lists.open-mpi.org Date: Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:19 PM Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn]