Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

How about this: diff --git a/config/distscript.sh b/config/distscript.sh index d7bdfa4..9f05a2f 100755 --- a/config/distscript.sh +++ b/config/distscript.sh @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ fi # Trivial helper function doit() { echo $* -$* +eval $* } echo "*** Copying doxygen-doc tree to

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

Same error. Brice Le 07/04/2014 23:43, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > How about: > > tar c -C /home/ci/hwloc-gitclone -h -f - doc/doxygen-doc | tar x -C > /home/ci/hwloc-gitclone/build/hwloc-gitclone -f - > > > > On Apr 7, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Brice Goglin > wrote: >

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

How about: tar c -C /home/ci/hwloc-gitclone -h -f - doc/doxygen-doc | tar x -C /home/ci/hwloc-gitclone/build/hwloc-gitclone -f - On Apr 7, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > Works on my Linux but fails on Solaris: > tar -c -C /home/ci/hwloc-gitclone -h -f -

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

Works on my Linux but fails on Solaris: tar -c -C /home/ci/hwloc-gitclone -h -f - doc/doxygen-doc | tar -x -C /home/ci/hwloc-gitclone/build/hwloc-gitclone -f - tar: /dev/rmt/0: No such file or directory Le 07/04/2014 23:29, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > --- a/config/distscript.sh > +++

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

On Apr 7, 2014, at 5:06 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" wrote: > Ok, lemme look at tar -- there's a canonical way to copy dir trees with tar; > let me look it up... Does this work for you? It seems to do the Right Thing for me on OS X and Linux. diff --git

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

On Apr 7, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > So you just broke my make dist :/ Really? Doh! :-( > I don't have MacOS to test things. If rsync or tar or whatever can > dereference symlinks, that'll work for me. Ok, lemme look at tar -- there's a canonical way to

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

So you just broke my make dist :/ I don't have MacOS to test things. If rsync or tar or whatever can dereference symlinks, that'll work for me. commit 0ebeff689e9414d5eedbf53e7c8697a3af5e4b72 Author: Brice Goglin List-Post: hwloc-devel@lists.open-mpi.org Date: Fri Mar

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

On Apr 7, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > So you're (always?) getting tarballs without any doc/doxygen-doc > subdirectories? That's correct -- doc/doxygen-doc is in the source tree, but does not end up in the tarball. > Does "make dist" say that it's copying the

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

So you're (always?) getting tarballs without any doc/doxygen-doc subdirectories? Does "make dist" say that it's copying the doxygen-doc subdirectory? Any idea who's removing it later? I managed to get such a tarball without doc only once, but it disappeared after I added some debug commands to

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

Right -- I've done that (i.e., if I do "make doc" again, it does nothing because it's already done). And "make dist" works fine. But "make distcheck" fails when it runs "make dist" in the subdir of the expanded tarball fails because doc/doxygen-doc doesn't exist in there. On Apr 7, 2014,

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

In v1.9+, you need make doc before make dist or make distcheck. It may explain your problem? I changed this a couple weeks ago to make things much easier to understand/maintain (but a little bit harder to use :)) Brice Le 07/04/2014 21:37, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > I just pushed

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

I just pushed 143e27248f928797e2e8532747386c67c9f8d873, which converted distscript.csh to distscript.sh. If it works well on master, we can pull it to the v1.9 branch. I notice that "make distcheck" is broken, however -- when it goes to "make dist" in the expanded tarball, I get the following

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

Le 31/03/2014 00:57, Christopher Samuel a écrit : > On 30/03/14 02:04, Ralph Castain wrote: > > > turns out that some linux distro's automatically set LS_COLORS in > > your environment when running old versions of csh/tcsh via their > > default dot files > > For example RHEL6 does this.. Looks

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/03/14 02:04, Ralph Castain wrote: > turns out that some linux distro's automatically set LS_COLORS in > your environment when running old versions of csh/tcsh via their > default dot files For example RHEL6 does this.. - -- Christopher

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

Jeff just left today for a 1-week vacation. However, this came up on the OMPI mailing list - turns out that some linux distro's automatically set LS_COLORS in your environment when running old versions of csh/tcsh via their default dot files, and it can cause problems with the script. So just

Re: [hwloc-devel] GIT: hwloc branch master updated. 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec

Jeff, Where does this LS_COLORS variable come from? Who is setting it? Brice Le 27/03/2014 11:45, MPI Team a écrit : > The branch, master has been updated >via 0e6fe307c10d47efee3fb95c50aee9c0f01bc8ec (commit) > from 00f85033d269e2c312370bb24043f92a92dff7e3 (commit) > > Those