Re: [hwloc-devel] P#0 -> P0 for logical numbers?

2010-01-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
With p/l prefixes: € lstopo -p - Machine(993MB) + Socketp0 + L2(2048KB) L1(32KB) + Corep0 + Pp0 L1(32KB) + Corep1 + Pp1 € lstopo - Machine(993MB) + Socketl0 + L2l0(2048KB) L1l0(32KB) + Corel0 + Pl0 L1l1(32KB) + Corel1 + Pl1 What I dislike is that this seems to bring odd words like

Re: [hwloc-devel] P#0 -> P0 for logical numbers?

2010-01-28 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > How about 0p for physical, such as Core0p? The "#" doesn't really mean > / connote anything. > > - > € lstopo -p - > Machine(993MB) + Socket0p + L2(2048KB) > L1(32KB) + Core0p + P0p > L1(32KB) + Core1p + P1p > € lstopo - >

Re: [hwloc-devel] P#0 -> P0 for logical numbers?

2010-01-28 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Since we changed the default behavior of lstopo to display logical > numbers instead of physical numbers, I've quite a few times taken one > for the other, leading to confusion. Mmm... good point. > I agree on the fact that it's > better to