Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-12 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > The *only* weird possibility would be if RH (or Suse) patched their > old glibcs to fix this problem but didn't update the minor number. Ok but in that case we'd just use the PLPA implementation that should work fine. On the long run

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Thu 12 Nov 2009 08:58:19 -0800, a écrit : > The *only* weird possibility would be if RH (or Suse) patched their > old glibcs to fix this problem but didn't update the minor number. Ok but in that case we'd just use the PLPA implementation that should work fine. On the long

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-12 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Nov 12, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Maybe what we can do is using PLPA's functions if __GLIBC__ is <= > >2 and __GLIBC_MINOR__ is < the first version which is known to be > >correct or if CPU_SET can't be compiled, and

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Thu 12 Nov 2009 08:34:24 -0800, a écrit : > On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Maybe what we can do is using PLPA's functions if __GLIBC__ is <= > >2 and __GLIBC_MINOR__ is < the first version which is known to be > >correct or if CPU_SET can't be compiled, and

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-12 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: Maybe what we can do is using PLPA's functions if __GLIBC__ is <= 2 and __GLIBC_MINOR__ is < the first version which is known to be correct or if CPU_SET can't be compiled, and rely on the glibc functions else. Of course we have to rely on

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 09 Nov 2009 08:05:47 -0500, a écrit : > Fair enough. What about if we have an AC check for > pthread_setaffinity_np and use that if it exists, and if it doesn't > use the PLPA way? Err, remember that pthread_setaffinity_np alone doesn't permit to bind another process,

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-09 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: What I dislike in that approach is that it means we'd have to closely follow future changes in the kernel ABI, while the API is not supposed to change (even if it has in the past). Also, now that glibc provides pthread_setaffinity_np, we

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Thu 05 Nov 2009 07:58:58 -0500, a écrit : > This problem may go away if we adapt PLPA's approach to sched_[set| > get]affinity. What I dislike in that approach is that it means we'd have to closely follow future changes in the kernel ABI, while the API is not supposed to change

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
This problem may go away if we adapt PLPA's approach to sched_[set| get]affinity. On Nov 4, 2009, at 10:34 PM, Chris Samuel wrote: - "Chris Samuel" wrote: > - "Jeff Squyres" wrote: > > > K. Clear for a final rc / release? > > Go for it, am

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-04 Thread Chris Samuel
- "Jeff Squyres" wrote: > K. Clear for a final rc / release? Go for it, am just about to go run a training course now so won't be available until this arvo Melbourne time.. cheers! Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Brice Goglin, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 22:03:11 +0100, a écrit : > I think pgcc building fine was the last possible problem, so I assume > everything is ok now. Same for me. Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-04 Thread Brice Goglin
I think pgcc building fine was the last possible problem, so I assume everything is ok now. Brice Jeff Squyres wrote: > K. Clear for a final rc / release? > > (due to timezone differences, I'm going to assume yes -- I'll make an > rc now and if all goes well, let's release tomorrow morning)

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-04 Thread Jeff Squyres
K. Clear for a final rc / release? (due to timezone differences, I'm going to assume yes -- I'll make an rc now and if all goes well, let's release tomorrow morning) On Nov 4, 2009, at 6:41 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: Chris Samuel, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 16:04:40 +1100, a écrit : > I'm still

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Chris Samuel, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 16:04:40 +1100, a écrit : > I'm still seeing a heap with the Intel compilers. Yes, these are mostly pedantism warnings which we do not need to fix for this release (would need tagging parameters as unused etc.) Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-04 Thread Chris Samuel
- "Jeff Squyres" wrote: > Thanks for your patience! Samuel just committed a > bunch more -- try the next one: That fixed up the PGI warnings, but I'm still seeing a heap with the Intel compilers. Output attached again. [csamuel@tango hwloc-0.9.1rc4r1282]$ icc -V

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Thanks for your patience! Samuel just committed a bunch more -- try the next one: http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/unofficial/ On Nov 3, 2009, at 6:19 PM, Chris Samuel wrote: - "Chris Samuel" wrote: > Will try PGI 7.0 now. I can confirm it compiles OK with

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-03 Thread Chris Samuel
- "Chris Samuel" wrote: > Will try PGI 7.0 now. I can confirm it compiles OK with PGI 7.0, 7.1 and 7.2 with the same warnings as for 8.0. These warnings also appear with 9.0. Lots of warnings from the Intel v11 compilers, I've attached a text file for the entire make

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-03 Thread Chris Samuel
- "Chris Samuel" wrote: > Grabbing now, thanks! Compiled OK with: [csamuel@tango hwloc-0.9.1rc3r1276]$ pgcc -V pgcc 8.0-6 64-bit target on x86-64 Linux -tp gh-64 Copyright 1989-2000, The Portland Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2000-2009, STMicroelectronics,

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-03 Thread Chris Samuel
- "Jeff Squyres" wrote: > Try this tarball: > > http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/unofficial/hwloc-0.9.1rc3r1276.tar.bz2 Grabbing now, thanks! Sorry for not seeing the email yesterday, it was a public holiday here yesterday (Melbourne Cup Day, yes we have a public

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Try this tarball: http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/unofficial/hwloc-0.9.1rc3r1276.tar.bz2 I cut it from the 0.9 branch with Samuel's latest commits (i.e., it's post rc3). It should be fully bootstrapped and not require you to have the latest autotools. On Nov 3, 2009, at 5:38 PM,

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-03 Thread Chris Samuel
- "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" wrote: > Pgcc issues fixed? Sorry folks, have not yet got the SVN checkout to configure yet due to it requiring newer tools than I have and am buried trying to get board reports out at present. Hopefully will have some time tomorrow 2-3pm my

Re: [hwloc-devel] Pgcc issues fixed?

2009-11-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Please note that I have not yet released hwloc yet -- I was waiting to hear back about the PGI issues... On Nov 2, 2009, at 6:28 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: Have we confirmed that the pgi issues are fixed such that we can release? -jms Sent from my PDA. No type good. -- Jeff