Re: [hwloc-devel] libhwloc.so version number

2010-06-03 Thread Samuel Thibault 
Jeff Squyres, le Thu 03 Jun 2010 15:02:35 -0400, a écrit :
> I think that hwloc's Libtool version number should go from 0:0:0 to 0:1:0.
> 
> Can someone sanity check to ensure that's right?

I believe that's right.

Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] libhwloc.so version number

2010-06-03 Thread Wheeler, Kyle Bruce 

On Jun 3, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

> Per the Libtool rules cited here (scroll down to the "Shared Library Version 
> Number" section):
> 
>http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/versions/
> 
> I think that hwloc's Libtool version number should go from 0:0:0 to 0:1:0.
> 
> Can someone sanity check to ensure that's right?

That looks right to me. Same interface (0), bugfix revision (1), no historical 
anything (0).
-- 
Kyle B. Wheeler, PhD
Dept. 1423: Scalable System Software
Sandia National Laboratories

[hwloc-devel] libhwloc.so version number

2010-06-03 Thread Jeff Squyres 
Looking at the changes from 1.0 -> 1.0.1, it doesn't look like any interfaces 
changed:


https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset?old_path=/branches/v1.0=2100_path=/branches/v1.0=HEAD

Per the Libtool rules cited here (scroll down to the "Shared Library Version 
Number" section):

http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/versions/

I think that hwloc's Libtool version number should go from 0:0:0 to 0:1:0.

Can someone sanity check to ensure that's right?

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/