Re: [hwloc-devel] rc5 = good?

2010-05-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
Fair enough; I was just curious if you want them over in v1.0.  If you want to 
move them over, go ahead and do so.  We don't necessarily have to cut another 
rc before final release if this is all that is left to be done...


On May 6, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:

> Jeff Squyres, le Thu 06 May 2010 13:39:43 -0400, a écrit :
> > Did you want to get those warning fixes in to v1.0?  (r2074 - 2076)
> >
> > Or are they trunk-only?
> 
> They concern rc5 as well, I'm just unsure they are really worth making
> yet another RC, as they have no impact on the behavior of hwloc at all.
> 
> Samuel
> ___
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
> 


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/




Re: [hwloc-devel] rc5 = good?

2010-05-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Thu 06 May 2010 13:39:43 -0400, a écrit :
> Did you want to get those warning fixes in to v1.0?  (r2074 - 2076)
> 
> Or are they trunk-only?

They concern rc5 as well, I'm just unsure they are really worth making
yet another RC, as they have no impact on the behavior of hwloc at all.

Samuel