Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc compile warnings patch

2009-10-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, These should now be fixed in the v0.9 branch. Thanks, Samuel

[hwloc-devel] automake silent-rules

2009-10-23 Thread Brice Goglin
I'd like to require automake 1.11 for hwloc 1.0 so that we get the new silent-rules feature. It gives you "CC foo.o" instead of the too-long unreadable compile line (if you do make V=0 or configure with --enable-silent-rules). Patch below. Does anybody have anything against this? Brice --- confi

Re: [hwloc-devel] automake silent-rules

2009-10-23 Thread Jeff Squyres
Ohh... that's nifty. I didn't even know about silent-rules! No objections here. On Oct 23, 2009, at 7:50 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: I'd like to require automake 1.11 for hwloc 1.0 so that we get the new silent-rules feature. It gives you "CC foo.o" instead of the too-long unreadable compile lin

Re: [hwloc-devel] 0.9.1rc2 failures

2009-10-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Thanks for the logs. Pavan Balaji, le Thu 22 Oct 2009 09:57:30 -0500, a écrit : > topology.c(74): remark #869: parameter "objs" was never referenced > topology.c(452): remark #981: operands are evaluated in unspecified order Such remarks are ok. (Google says 981 is really pedantism) > to

Re: [hwloc-devel] 0.9.1rc2 failures

2009-10-23 Thread Brice Goglin
Samuel Thibault wrote: >> topology-linux.c(787): remark #593: variable "proc_oscoreids" was set but >> never used >> unsigned proc_oscoreids[] = { [0 ... HWLOC_NBMAXCPUS-1] = -1 }; >> > > Heh, good catch. We indeed do not need it any more to manage the > computation. Brice, do you think

Re: [hwloc-devel] 0.9.1rc2 failures

2009-10-23 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > PGC-W-0006-Empty translation unit (lstopo-cairo.c: 6) > PGC-W-0006-Empty translation unit (lstopo-xml.c: 6) These are expected. Do you think we should use AM_CONDITIONAL's to conditionally add those source files to the SOURCES list rat

Re: [hwloc-devel] 0.9.1rc2 failures

2009-10-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 23 Oct 2009 09:07:52 -0400, a écrit : > On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> PGC-W-0006-Empty translation unit (lstopo-cairo.c: 6) > >> PGC-W-0006-Empty translation unit (lstopo-xml.c: 6) > > > >These are expected. > > Do you think we should use AM_CONDITIO

Re: [hwloc-devel] 0.9.1rc2 failures

2009-10-23 Thread Jeff Squyres
K. I'll do it. On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: Jeff Squyres, le Fri 23 Oct 2009 09:07:52 -0400, a écrit : > On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> PGC-W-0006-Empty translation unit (lstopo-cairo.c: 6) > >> PGC-W-0006-Empty translation unit (lstopo-xml.c: 6

Re: [hwloc-devel] automake silent-rules

2009-10-23 Thread Pavan Balaji
You can make it older automake safe by adding the following rule in your configure.ac: m4_ifdef([AM_SILENT_RULES], [AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])]) It doesn't matter to me (we anyway use 1.11 for MPICH2), but it might be convenient for other users. -- Pavan On 10/23/2009 06:50 AM, Brice Goglin wrote

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.0a1r1242)

2009-10-23 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.0a1r1242 Start time: Fri Oct 23 21:01:05 EDT 2009 End time: Fri Oct 23 21:03:15 EDT 2009 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador