Jeff Squyres, le Thu 05 Nov 2009 07:58:58 -0500, a écrit :
> This problem may go away if we adapt PLPA's approach to sched_[set|
> get]affinity.
What I dislike in that approach is that it means we'd have to closely
follow future changes in the kernel ABI, while the API is not supposed
to change
On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
What I dislike in that approach is that it means we'd have to closely
follow future changes in the kernel ABI, while the API is not supposed
to change (even if it has in the past). Also, now that glibc provides
pthread_setaffinity_np, we
Brice Goglin wrote:
> * Probing
>
> >From what I understand, plpa_have_topology_information() tells whether
> PLPA knows what's in the hardware, while plpa_api_probe() tells whether
> binding is supported. We could add:
>
> + hwloc_topology_support(hwloc_topology_t topology, unsigned *support)
>
