Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1589

2010-01-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 9, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: >>> Mmm, couldn't that information (I guess you mean the "Definitions", >>> "Hwloc Objects" and "Hwloc Indexes") be moved to another, common hwloc.1 >>> page? >> >> I'm also realizing that these should also be in the PDF/html >> documentation. This

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1589

2010-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 09:48:14 -0500, a écrit : > If we keep them separate, I think I'd be in favor of splitting much of the > top of hwloc-bind.1in off into hwloc.1in and having each of the tool man > pages refer to it. That was my plan. The idea is that while the PDF has general pr

Re: [hwloc-devel] #23: network topology support and v1.0 semanticfixes

2010-01-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
Been mulling this for a few days; here's my thoughts... On Jan 7, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Considering future network topology support, I believe we probably need > to fix a couple of things before releasing 1.0. Just to sum up the a > bunch of points that have been raised in

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1589

2010-01-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 11, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > If we keep them separate, I think I'd be in favor of splitting much of the > > top of hwloc-bind.1in off into hwloc.1in and having each of the tool man > > pages refer to it. > > That was my plan. K; I can do that. > The idea is that whi

Re: [hwloc-devel] #23: network topology support and v1.0 semanticfixes

2010-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 10:12:00 -0500, a écrit : > Been mulling this for a few days; here's my thoughts... Thanks! > Are you thinking of adding bandwidth attributes? When the information is available through some way (be it by hand), yes. > Or are you thinking of adding weighting betw

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1589

2010-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 10:12:45 -0500, a écrit : > > The idea is that while the PDF has general principles, the details of > > the vocabulary & such looks like a manpage and is useful to have in a > > manpage. Having it as a real manpages is convenient when using man tools > > that can qu

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1589

2010-01-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > For extra bonus points, I'll have the PDF refer to hwloc.1. :-) > > Mmm, maybe that wasn't exactly my plan: it was that hwloc.1 would FWIW, it's actually hwloc.7 (realized that section 7 was more appropriate after I was typing it up). >

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1589

2010-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 11:31:12 -0500, a écrit : > That's what I was trying to say in my first mail -- the text that is now > hwloc.7in overlaps what is currently in hwloc.doxy (*some* text overlaps; > some does not). I.e., hwloc.7in and hwloc.doxy intersect; one is not a > subset of

Re: [hwloc-devel] #23: network topology support and v1.0semanticfixes

2010-01-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Are you thinking of adding bandwidth attributes? > > When the information is available through some way (be it by hand), yes. > > > Or are you thinking of adding weighting between objects in the hierarchy? > > Or ...? > > I'd tend to th

Re: [hwloc-devel] #23: network topology support and v1.0semanticfixes

2010-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 14:21:53 -0500, a écrit : > On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > I once thought about adding gpuset, maybe, but since the kinds of > > objects will probably vary a lot, maybe it's better to not try to be > > smart and let layers above handle it,

Re: [hwloc-devel] #23: network topology support andv1.0semanticfixes

2010-01-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 11, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Maybe it would be better to add a (void*) on to the object to allow > > arbitrary 3rd parties to cache information off any given hwloc object. > > I.e. the userdata pointer in the hwloc_obj_t structure? Ummm... right. :-) (I really need

Re: [hwloc-devel] #23: network topology support andv1.0semanticfixes

2010-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 15:20:45 -0500, a écrit : > > > I'm curious -- what's the definition of cat'ing 2 XML files together? > > > Does the 2nd become a subtree of the first? > > > > No, I mean putting both under a "misc" object for instance. > > Can you explain more; maybe provide an

Re: [hwloc-devel] #23: network topology support andv1.0semanticfixes

2010-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 21:27:35 +0100, a écrit : > Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 15:20:45 -0500, a écrit : > > > > I'm curious -- what's the definition of cat'ing 2 XML files together? > > > > Does the 2nd become a subtree of the first? > > > > > > No, I mean putting both under a

Re: [hwloc-devel] #23: network topology support andv1.0semanticfixes

2010-01-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 11, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > The concatenation would be > > > > > >dmi_board_vendor="" dmi_board_name="" memory_kB="0" huge_page_free="0" > huge_page_size_kB="0"> > > >dmi_board_vendor="" dmi_board_name="" memory_kB="0" huge_page_free="0" > huge_pag

Re: [hwloc-devel] #23: network topology support andv1.0semanticfixes

2010-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 15:54:55 -0500, a écrit : > cat a.xml b.xml > c.xml > > and then using c.xml directly (which I didn't see how that would work). > Instead, you're talking about manually stitching multiple XML files together > under a single , further enclosed under a single "Mis

Re: [hwloc-devel] "file name is too long" error during make distwith libpci branch

2010-01-11 Thread Brice Goglin
Jeff Squyres wrote: > I don't think we should let doxygen dictate the code that we write. Agreed. Headers are already kind of the horrible :) > 1. make doxy do what we want > Setting SHORT_NAMES to YES in doxygen.cfg seems to help. html and latex filenames are replaced with things like a00026

Re: [hwloc-devel] "file name is too long" error during make distwith libpci branch

2010-01-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Brice Goglin, le Mon 11 Jan 2010 23:50:43 +0100, a écrit : > Anyway, if we're going to drop latex files before building the tarball, > maybe we can drop manpages that are not in $(man3_MANS) too? Agree, we don't need to install them anyway, and it saves room too :) Samuel

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.0a1r1595)

2010-01-11 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.0a1r1595 Start time: Mon Jan 11 21:01:04 EST 2010 End time: Mon Jan 11 21:03:11 EST 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador