Re: [hwloc-devel] Change bind API.

Bert Wesarg, le Sun 21 Mar 2010 13:31:14 +0100, a écrit : > I would like to propose an interface change for these function, so > that the caller provide the to-be-filled cpuset, to reduce the > alloc/free frequency. This is indeed better (and actually reduces the amount of code in hwloc), I have

Re: [hwloc-devel] Change bind API.

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:21, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Bert Wesarg, le Sun 21 Mar 2010 13:31:14 +0100, a écrit : >> I would like to propose an interface change for these function, so >> that the caller provide the to-be-filled cpuset, to reduce the >> alloc/free

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1840

Bert Wesarg, le Mon 22 Mar 2010 12:20:58 +0100, a écrit : > > -static hwloc_cpuset_t > > -hwloc_aix_get_thisproc_cpubind(hwloc_topology_t topology, int policy) > > +static int > > +hwloc_aix_get_thisproc_cpubind(hwloc_topology_t topology, hwloc_cpuset_t > > hwloc_set, int policy) > >  { > >  

Re: [hwloc-devel] 1.0-rc1

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 21:29, Brice Goglin wrote: > Brice Goglin wrote: >> Are we doing a 1.0-rc1 soon ? >> > > Same question again :) I suspect, I can't propose API changes after that, right? ;-) Bert > > Brice >

Re: [hwloc-devel] 1.0-rc1

On Mar 22, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Bert Wesarg wrote: > > Same question again :) > > I suspect, I can't propose API changes after that, right? ;-) It would be good, yes. :-) Have you had a good look around hwloc? I.e., do you have a feel for whether you will be suggesting any more API changes?

Re: [hwloc-devel] 1.0-rc1

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 21:49, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Mar 22, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Bert Wesarg wrote: > >> > Same question again :) >> >> I suspect, I can't propose API changes after that, right? ;-) > > It would be good, yes.  :-) > > Have you had a good look around hwloc?