Am 30.09.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
Marco Atzeri, le dim. 30 sept. 2018 20:02:59 +0200, a ecrit:
also adding a HWLOC_DECLSPEC on the first case distances.c:347
does not solve the issue as the two declaration are not the same.
Suggestion ?
Perhaps use hwloc_uint64_t instead of
Am 01.10.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Brice Goglin:
Le 01/10/2018 à 19:22, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
Your own machine doesn't matter. None is these tests look at your CPU or
topology. *All* of them on all x86 machines.
CPUID are emulated by reading files, nothing is read from your local
machine
Le 01/10/2018 à 17:27, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
> Am 30.09.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>> Marco Atzeri, le dim. 30 sept. 2018 20:02:59 +0200, a ecrit:
>>> also adding a HWLOC_DECLSPEC on the first case distances.c:347
>>> does not solve the issue as the two declaration are not the same.
Le 01/10/2018 à 19:22, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
>
>> Unfortunately that test script isn't easy to debug in the v2.x branch.
>> If that OpenProcess is where things fail, I assume that the line that
>> fails is "lstopo --ps". On MinGW, that code is ignored because /proc
>> doesn't exist. Does /proc
Le 02/10/2018 à 00:28, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
> Am 01.10.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Brice Goglin:
>> Le 01/10/2018 à 19:22, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
>>>
>>
>> Your own machine doesn't matter. None is these tests look at your CPU or
>> topology. *All* of them on all x86 machines.
>> CPUID are emulated by
