On Nov 11, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> How about HWLOC_UNSUPPORTED_SYS?
I don't think it's a good idea to make it a compile-time thing rather
than a runtime-time thing: if we expose to the application the fact
that the OS on which the application is building is not supported, it
Jeff Squyres, le Wed 11 Nov 2009 05:54:00 -0800, a écrit :
> How about HWLOC_UNSUPPORTED_SYS?
I don't think it's a good idea to make it a compile-time thing rather
than a runtime-time thing: if we expose to the application the fact
that the OS on which the application is building is not supported,
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> How about HWLOC_UNSUPPORTED_SYS?
>
We currently have a mix of internal LINUX/SOLARIS/../UNSUPPORTED_SYS and
one public HWLOC_LINUX_SYS. I could merge all of them into HWLOC_*_SYS,
sure.
Brice
How about HWLOC_UNSUPPORTED_SYS?
On Nov 11, 2009, at 2:38 AM, wrote:
Author: bgoglin
Date: 2009-11-11 05:38:26 EST (Wed, 11 Nov 2009)
New Revision: 1330
URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/1330
Log:
Add hwloc_topology_get_support()
This also defines UNSUPPORTED_SYS on not supp
