Re: [hwloc-devel] get_last_cpu_location for process (Was: Hardware locality (hwloc) v2.0.0-beta1 released)

2017-12-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Brice Goglin, on ven. 29 déc. 2017 11:15:09 +0100, wrote: > I couldn't test since binding doesn't seem to work in my qemu (always > goes to PU #0), even when using qemu-x86_64 on x86_64. Is this fixed > with your patches sent to qemu-devel yesterday? My get/setaffinity patches shouldn't fix

Re: [hwloc-devel] get_last_cpu_location for process (Was: Hardware locality (hwloc) v2.0.0-beta1 released)

2017-12-29 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 28/12/2017 à 19:20, Samuel Thibault a écrit : >> we can add a hwloc env var to disable process-wide asserts. > So I would set it for all Debian builds? (we don't have a fixed set of > archs which are built inside qemu-user) > Yes, if that's OK for you. I couldn't test since binding doesn't

Re: [hwloc-devel] get_last_cpu_location for process (Was: Hardware locality (hwloc) v2.0.0-beta1 released)

2017-12-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Brice Goglin, on jeu. 28 déc. 2017 18:47:29 +0100, wrote: > Le 28/12/2017 à 16:18, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > > Samuel Thibault, on jeu. 28 déc. 2017 15:08:30 +0100, wrote: > >> Samuel Thibault, on mer. 20 déc. 2017 18:32:48 +0100, wrote: > >>> I have uploaded it to debian experimental, so when

Re: [hwloc-devel] get_last_cpu_location for process (Was: Hardware locality (hwloc) v2.0.0-beta1 released)

2017-12-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 28/12/2017 à 16:18, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Samuel Thibault, on jeu. 28 déc. 2017 15:08:30 +0100, wrote: >> Samuel Thibault, on mer. 20 déc. 2017 18:32:48 +0100, wrote: >>> I have uploaded it to debian experimental, so when it passes NEW, >>> various arch test results will show up on >>>