Hello
We now have a CI slave running cygwin on Windows 10. Everything should
work fine in v2.0.3. In the meantime, the only patch that you need to
add on top of what you sent earlier is:
https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/commit/3ac7bd3b3bddd763b2e58eff77a2104ea79230af
(for fixing tests/hwloc/x86)
OK
I pushed your #ifdef fixes and I fixed the printf warning.
I opened 3 issues related to x86 cpuid and OpenProcess failing in lstopo
--ps. Hopefully we'll find a way to play with cygwin here for real in
the near future, and then add that config to our CI.
Brice
___
Am 02.10.2018 um 07:47 schrieb Brice Goglin:
Le 02/10/2018 à 00:28, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
Am 01.10.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Brice Goglin:
Le 01/10/2018 à 19:22, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
Your own machine doesn't matter. None is these tests look at your CPU or
topology. *All* of them on all x86 m
Le 02/10/2018 à 00:28, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
> Am 01.10.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Brice Goglin:
>> Le 01/10/2018 à 19:22, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
>>>
>>
>> Your own machine doesn't matter. None is these tests look at your CPU or
>> topology. *All* of them on all x86 machines.
>> CPUID are emulated by r
Am 01.10.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Brice Goglin:
Le 01/10/2018 à 19:22, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
Your own machine doesn't matter. None is these tests look at your CPU or
topology. *All* of them on all x86 machines.
CPUID are emulated by reading files, nothing is read from your local
machine topolog
Le 01/10/2018 à 19:22, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
>
>> Unfortunately that test script isn't easy to debug in the v2.x branch.
>> If that OpenProcess is where things fail, I assume that the line that
>> fails is "lstopo --ps". On MinGW, that code is ignored because /proc
>> doesn't exist. Does /proc exi
Am 01.10.2018 um 18:56 schrieb Brice Goglin:
Le 01/10/2018 à 17:27, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
Am 30.09.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
Marco Atzeri, le dim. 30 sept. 2018 20:02:59 +0200, a ecrit:
also adding a HWLOC_DECLSPEC on the first case distances.c:347
does not solve the issue as the
Le 01/10/2018 à 17:27, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
> Am 30.09.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>> Marco Atzeri, le dim. 30 sept. 2018 20:02:59 +0200, a ecrit:
>>> also adding a HWLOC_DECLSPEC on the first case distances.c:347
>>> does not solve the issue as the two declaration are not the same.
>>
Am 30.09.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
Marco Atzeri, le dim. 30 sept. 2018 20:02:59 +0200, a ecrit:
also adding a HWLOC_DECLSPEC on the first case distances.c:347
does not solve the issue as the two declaration are not the same.
Suggestion ?
Perhaps use hwloc_uint64_t instead of uint
Marco Atzeri, le dim. 30 sept. 2018 20:02:59 +0200, a ecrit:
> also adding a HWLOC_DECLSPEC on the first case distances.c:347
> does not solve the issue as the two declaration are not the same.
>
> Suggestion ?
Perhaps use hwloc_uint64_t instead of uint64_t in hwloc/distances.c?
Samuel
_
10 matches
Mail list logo