On Behalf Of Brice Goglin
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 4:47 PM
> To: Wheeler, Kyle Bruce
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] [EXTERNAL] Re: hwloc_get_latency() failures and
> confusion
>
> Le 07/08/2012 00:36, Wheeler, Kyle Bruce a écrit :
>> A, that's key! The d
August 06, 2012 4:47 PM
To: Wheeler, Kyle Bruce
Cc:
Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] [EXTERNAL] Re: hwloc_get_latency() failures and
confusion
Le 07/08/2012 00:36, Wheeler, Kyle Bruce a écrit :
> A, that's key! The documentation currently says "Look at ancestor
> objects from the b
Le 07/08/2012 00:36, Wheeler, Kyle Bruce a écrit :
> A, that's key! The documentation currently says "Look at ancestor
> objects from the bottom to the top until one of them contains a
> distance matrix that matches the objects exactly", which suggests to
> me that it will traverse the object h
On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> You should not be getting a distance matrix for depth 0 above. You get
> one for depth=1 (the depth of NUMAnodes in your topology).
Ahh, ok. Well, at least I know what I *should* get now. :)
Sheepishly, I have to admit that I just figured it out
