The bridge cannot be "not connected to anything". All objects have a
parent (and are a child of that parent) except the very-top root object.
Theoretically, the bridge could be connected anywhere. In practice it's
connected to a NUMA node, a root object, or (rarely) a group of numa nodes.
The
Can you send their /proc/cpuinfo ?
It looks like all ARM platforms have very similar cpuinfo files in
Linux, so I expect something similar to what's below, but maybe we'll
see better which fields are interesting.
Brice
Le 28/01/2014 18:38, Jeff Hammond a écrit :
> I don't know the answer but
I don't know the answer but I'm happy to test on my ARM systems if you
have an experiment to perform.
Right now, I have an NVIDIA Kayla board and a Parallella board, both
of which are ARMv7.
Jeff
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
wrote:
> I passed
Le 28/01/2014 14:31, Brice Goglin a écrit :
> Le 28/01/2014 13:00, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>> Brice Goglin, le Tue 28 Jan 2014 12:46:24 +0100, a écrit :
>>> 42: xchg %ebx,%rbx
>>>
>>> I guess having both ebx and rbx on these lines isn't OK. On Linux, I get
>>> rsi instead of ebx, no problem.
Le 28/01/2014 13:00, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> Brice Goglin, le Tue 28 Jan 2014 12:46:24 +0100, a écrit :
>> 42: xchg %ebx,%rbx
>>
>> I guess having both ebx and rbx on these lines isn't OK. On Linux, I get
>> rsi instead of ebx, no problem.
>>
>> Samuel, any idea?
> Mmm, IIRC, "unsigned long"
I passed this on to my OMPI ARM contact (Leif Lindholm). Here's what he said:
"It gets a bit trickier on ARM... since we may also have (implementation
time) configurable cache sizes and also big.LITTLE (different processor
models executing in the same SMP system)."
He passed the
Brice Goglin, le Tue 28 Jan 2014 12:46:24 +0100, a écrit :
> 42: xchg %ebx,%rbx
>
> I guess having both ebx and rbx on these lines isn't OK. On Linux, I get
> rsi instead of ebx, no problem.
>
> Samuel, any idea?
Mmm, IIRC, "unsigned long" on windows may not be 64bit but 32bit?
Perhaps we
Le 28/01/2014 09:57, Brice Goglin a écrit :
> I will debug a bit more to see if it's actually a 64bit cpuid problem
> on windows.
The x86 backend is entirely disabled in the 64bit windows build because
configure fails to compile the cpuid assembly (in my mingw64 with gcc 4.7).
It says:
40:
Le 28/01/2014 09:46, Robin Scher a écrit :
> Hi, thanks for responding.
>
> The CPUModel is definitely available on this machine. A 32 bit process
> on the same machine correctly finds the model name using code that
> calls the cpuid inline assembly to get it, and the machine itself is a
> VM
Hi, thanks for responding.
The CPUModel is definitely available on this machine. A 32 bit process on the
same machine correctly finds the model name using code that calls the cpuid
inline assembly to get it, and the machine itself is a VM running on a Mac, and
I get the same model name from
Hello,
Is anybody familiar with ARM CPUs?
I am adding more CPU information because Intel needs more:
CPUVendor=GenuineIntel
CPUModel=Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz
CPUModelNumber=45
CPUFamilyNumber=6
Would something similar be useful for ARM? What are the fields below
from
11 matches
Mail list logo