Le 11/01/2014 01:58, Chris Samuel a écrit :
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:54:17 AM Chris Samuel wrote:
>
>> We've got both an older Altix XE cluster and a UV10 (both running RHEL) I
>> can test on if it's useful?
> Forgot I already had both 1.7.2 and 1.8 built for both - all fine (RHEL6.4).
>
This was
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:54:17 AM Chris Samuel wrote:
> We've got both an older Altix XE cluster and a UV10 (both running RHEL) I
> can test on if it's useful?
Forgot I already had both 1.7.2 and 1.8 built for both - all fine (RHEL6.4).
--
Christopher SamuelSenior Systems Administrator
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:27:16 PM Jeff Squyres wrote:
> It's an SGI x86_64 server, running SLES 11.
Any details on what sort of server?
We've got both an older Altix XE cluster and a UV10 (both running RHEL) I can
test on if it's useful?
cheers,
Chris
--
Christopher SamuelSenior System
Le 11/01/2014 00:27, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> Jeff Becker (CC'ed) reported to me a failure with hwloc 1.7.2 (in OMPI
> trunk). I had him verify this with a standalone hwloc 1.7.2, and then had
> him try standalone hwloc 1.8 as well -- all got the same failure.
>
> Here's what he's see
Jeff Becker (CC'ed) reported to me a failure with hwloc 1.7.2 (in OMPI trunk).
I had him verify this with a standalone hwloc 1.7.2, and then had him try
standalone hwloc 1.8 as well -- all got the same failure.
Here's what he's seeing in 1.7.2:
$ lstopo
Different OS indexes
lstopo: topology-li