t_numanode_obj_by_os_index?
>
> Thanks,Rob
>
>
> *From:* hwloc-users [hwloc-users-boun...@open-mpi.org] on behalf of
> Brice Goglin [brice.gog...@inria.fr]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 04, 2014 6:25 AM
> *To:* hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org
> *Subject:* Re: [hwloc-users] setting
ex?
Thanks,Rob
From: hwloc-users [hwloc-users-boun...@open-mpi.org] on behalf of Brice Goglin
[brice.gog...@inria.fr]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 6:25 AM
To: hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org
Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] setting memory bindings
I added a new doc/examples/ repos
I added a new doc/examples/ repository to better show how to use
bitmaps, cpu and memory binding etc.
https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/tree/master/doc/examples
If you see anything missing, don't hesitate to ask.
Brice
Le 19/08/2014 19:10, Aulwes, Rob a écrit :
> ok, in the meantime, is th
rg>>
Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] setting memory bindings
Hello,
I am coming back on this thread to fix things before releasing v1.10.
Regarding your question below, there's already an answer with
hwloc_topology_get_support() which returns things like
support->membind->rep
..@inria.fr>>
> Reply-To: Hardware locality user list <mailto:hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org>>
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:55:57 +0200
> To: Hardware locality user list <mailto:hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org>>
> Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] setting memory bindings
&
ty user list
mailto:hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org>>
Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] setting memory bindings
REPLICATE isn't support either on Linux unfortunately.
I'll look at clarifying the doc and/or returning an error and/or adding a way
to find out.
Brice
Le 19/08/2014 19:00,
any doc?
>
> Thanks for the help! Rob
>
> From: Brice Goglin mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr>>
> Reply-To: Hardware locality user list <mailto:hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org>>
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:03:56 +0200
> To: Hardware locality user list <mailto:hw
ate: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:03:56 +0200
To: Hardware locality user list
mailto:hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org>>
Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] setting memory bindings
REPLICATE isn't support either on Linux unfortunately.
I'll look at clarifying the doc and/or returning an error and/or adding
>> mem_nodeset, HWLOC_MEMBIND_NEXTTOUCH, 0);
>>
>> where
>>
>> mem_nodeset = hwloc_topology_get_complete_nodeset(_topo);
>>
>> Thanks,Rob
>>
>> From: Brice Goglin mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr>>
>> Reply-To: Hardware l
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:55:57 +0200
To: Hardware locality user list
mailto:hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org>>
Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] setting memory bindings
NEXTTOUCH isn't supported on Linux. I hope you'd get an error if you request it.
Brice
Le 19/08/2014 18:48, Aulwe
mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr>>
> Reply-To: Hardware locality user list <mailto:hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org>>
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:44:05 +0200
> To: Hardware locality user list <mailto:hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org>>
> Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] setting memory bi
gt;
Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] setting memory bindings
Le 19/08/2014 18:38, Aulwes, Rob a écrit :
Hi,
I'm trying to write a custom C++ allocator that wraps hwloc calls. I've tried
using various hwloc_alloc* functions to set the memory bindings, but when I
call hwloc_get_area_membind_n
Le 19/08/2014 18:38, Aulwes, Rob a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a custom C++ allocator that wraps hwloc calls.
> I've tried using various hwloc_alloc* functions to set the memory
> bindings, but when I call hwloc_get_area_membind_nodeset to verify, I
> don't get the same policy I passed t
Hi,
I'm trying to write a custom C++ allocator that wraps hwloc calls. I've tried
using various hwloc_alloc* functions to set the memory bindings, but when I
call hwloc_get_area_membind_nodeset to verify, I don't get the same policy I
passed to alloc. Are there example codes that show how to
14 matches
Mail list logo