Just another things:
The id showed in the GPU box from lstopo, is the same device_id CUDA
numeration used in some function like setDevice() for example?
More better:
gpu 1 from lstopo = ? gpu 1 for CUDA runtime?
Thanks.
2012/8/29 Gabriele Fatigati
> Good!
>
> Now it
Good!
Now it works well.
Many tanks!
2012/8/28 Samuel Thibault
> Gabriele Fatigati, le Tue 28 Aug 2012 18:10:41 +0200, a écrit :
> > How can cuda branch help me? lstopo output of that branch is the same of
> the
> > trunk.
>
> You need to make sure that hwloc found
Hi,
thanks for the reply.
How can cuda branch help me? lstopo output of that branch is the same of
the trunk.
Another question: the GPU IDs are the same (10de: 06d2). How is it possible?
Thanks.
2012/8/28 Samuel Thibault
> Brice Goglin, le Tue 28 Aug 2012 14:43:53
Brice Goglin, le Tue 28 Aug 2012 14:43:53 +0200, a écrit :
> > $ lstopo
> > Socket #0
> > Socket #1
> > PCI...
> > (connected to socket #1)
> >
> > vs
> >
> > $ lstopo
> > Socket #0
> > Socket #1
> > PCI...
> > (connected to both sockets)
>
> Fortunately, this won't occur in most
Le 28/08/2012 14:23, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> Gabriele Fatigati, le Tue 28 Aug 2012 14:19:44 +0200, a écrit :
>> I'm using hwloc 1.5. I would to see how GPUs are connected with the processor
>> socket using lstopo command.
> About connexion with the socket, there is indeed no real graphical
>
Gabriele Fatigati, le Tue 28 Aug 2012 14:19:44 +0200, a écrit :
> I'm using hwloc 1.5. I would to see how GPUs are connected with the processor
> socket using lstopo command.
About connexion with the socket, there is indeed no real graphical
difference between "connected to socket #1" and