Hi all,
I saw ko_KR.UTF-8 and ja_JP.UTF-8 XLC_LOCALE files has accepted into
CVS (#5421, Jungshik Shin). Is it sane to add zh_TW.UTF-8 and zh_CN.UTF-8
XLC_LOCALE also?
Also putting BIG5-0 for legacy support in UTF-8 is a right thing to do?
Regards,
Leon
--
Leon Ho, Red Hat Inc., Asia
I use the non-BMP entries and let people only use
> fonts with support for those glyphs?
I think the idea is to stick to its ISO10646-1:2000 codepoints as most
HKSCS fonts I have seen are only reference to these codepoints (which
within BMP).
Leon
--
Leon Ho, Red Hat Inc., Asia-Pacific Operati
o.gov.hk/digital21/eng/hkscs/download.html
Other useful documents:
http://www.info.gov.hk/digital21/eng/hkscs/document.html
>
> With these additions, a GB18030 font would advertise support for:
>
> zh, zh-cn, zh-tw, zh-sg, zh-mo
>
> while older GB2312 fonts wou
inux.org/linux-utf8/2001-11/msg00093.html
>
> for detail.
--
Leon Ho, Red Hat Inc., Asia-Pacific Operations <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Files:http://people.redhat.com/llch
Legal:http://apac.redhat.com/disclaimer
___
I18n mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n
I got a status window to pop up.)
>
> If the previous used to work, it probably was because Xlib used to be
> less strict about checking the IM server name; xcin doesn't seem to
> support 'xcin' as a servername, just xcin-zh_TW and xcin-zh_CN.
--
Leon Ho, Red Ha