Hi,
At Thu, 20 Jun 2002 01:18:53 +0900,
Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Ok, here is a patch for gbk-0.enc to fix problems. Unicode PUA
> characters are not removed.
I just sent the patch to patch@xfree86 and seq 5313 was given.
---
Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/
Hi,
At 18 Jun 2002 17:55:27 +0100,
juliusz chroboczek wrote:
> TK> XFree86's table has additional codepoints to U+E7xx and U+E8xx,
> TK> which CP936 does not have. I don't know how to handle these
> TK> codepoints. (left unremoved?)
>
> I suggest going ahead and removing them. If somebody co
TK> XFree86's table has additional codepoints to U+E7xx and U+E8xx,
TK> which CP936 does not have. I don't know how to handle these
TK> codepoints. (left unremoved?)
I suggest going ahead and removing them. If somebody complains, we'll
know what they are for.
Hi,
At 17 Jun 2002 16:37:23 +0100,
juliusz chroboczek wrote:
> Quite possible, I'm the body who compiled the tables, and my knowledge
> of East-Asian encodings is superficial at best.
>
> I'll let you send a patch (and take responsibility for it).
I am now preparing a patch.
I found that GNU
I am now working on improvement of luit to support GBK and TCVN.
During the work, I found a problem on GBK mapping table in
/xc/fonts/encodings/large/gbk-0.enc.gz file.
For example, the gbk-0.enc.gz file has the following line:
0x82FE 0x8351 0x50BC
This line seems to intend the following
