Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kim-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-data-model-04

2018-02-06 Thread elopez . ietf
Yes, I support this draft, and thank the authors for their effort! Cheers!Ed Lopez On 1/26/2018 at 6:21 PM, "Linda Dunbar" wrote: The authors of I2NSF Network Security Functions-Facing Interface YANG Data Model

Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req

2016-09-27 Thread elopez . ietf
I am good with the framework, but I have reservations on the functional and operational requirements. I'm good to adopt this as a WG document, in the intent that we need to focus our effort on this, but I'm not comfortable with the content in its current state - Ed On 9/21/2016 at 1:55 PM,

Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model

2016-09-12 Thread elopez . ietf
One of the difficulties in defining an ACL is actually in how an ACL works. The RFC 4949 definition describes a 'mechanism' where ietf-netmod-acl-model describe a functional 'ordered set'. In other words, RFC 4949 does not say how a list is processed, where ietf-netmod-acl-model implies a serial