[I2nsf] Help on turning I2NSF Information Models to Data Models

I'm working on some data models for I2NSF that intersect with I2RS Filter-Based RIB Models and BGP Flow Specification Data models. I could use some advice from the authors of the following information models. My focus is to be able to drive the use the flow filter Yang models (I2NSF

[I2nsf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-hares-i2nsf-ddos-yang-dm-00.txt

-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 6:40 PM To: Susan Hares; Robert Moskowitz Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hares-i2nsf-ddos-yang-dm-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-hares-i2nsf-ddos-yang-dm-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Susan Hares and posted to the IETF

Re: [I2nsf] [i2rs] relationship between "draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt" and "draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00"?

r [mailto:linda.dun...@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:15 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: i...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [i2rs] relationship between "draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt" and "draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00"? Sue, Both those drafts are about YANG

[I2nsf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-08.txt

[mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 2:04 PM To: Jaehoon Jeong; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org; Susan Hares; Christian Jacquenet; Jaehoon Paul Jeong; Diego Lopez; Rakesh Kumar; Diego R. Lopez; Christian Jacquenet; Myo Zarny Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf

Re: [I2nsf] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-07.txt

Paul: Thank you for the quick response. I’ve created a version -08.txt with just these changes. Version -09 adds URL references to version -08.txt Sue Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 10:01 AM

Re: [I2nsf] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-07.txt

Thanks for catching that one.  sue Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Rakesh Kumar <rkku...@juniper.net> Date: 1/30/17 12:34 AM (GMT-06:00) To: Susan Hares <sha...@ndzh.com>, i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: adr...@olddog.c

Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model

[mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Annika Sparkles Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 1:51 PM To: John Strassner Cc: Rakesh Kumar; DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA; i2nsf@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar; Xialiang (Frank); elopez.i...@nym.hush.com; Susan Hares Subject: Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition

Re: [I2nsf] Comments on draft-kumar-i2nsfcontroller-use-cases-00.txt versus draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-01.txt

Rakesh: I hope to get the draft out by early morning on Friday to both you and my co-authors. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rakesh Kumar Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 12:55 AM To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on draft

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

Last call. Sue From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dun...@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:52 AM To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised Sue, Sure. Are there any gating issues for moving it to WGLC? Linda From: Susan Hares

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

to Seoul, Korea. I look to chatting with you Saturday at the Hackathon. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 9:48 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda

Re: [I2nsf] Comyou earlier on this topic: ments/questions about draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases

Gabriel: I believe responded to you before on this topic, but I am resending the information – in case I forgot. Please let me know if the resolution of these comments is ok for you. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gabriel Lopez Sent: Thursday, October

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

Linda, Adrian and I2NSF people: It appears I missed Paul’s and Daniels comments for the problem statement/use case. I’ll send my comment resolution to the list today. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 9:40 PM

Re: [I2nsf] Comments/questions about draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases

Daniel: I believe the 3rd revision will fix most of these problems. I’ve included comments below. I will send the 3rd revision out once I reach the hotel in Seoul Tonight. Please see my comments below. I will await your confirmation on the comments prior to adding new text into

Re: [I2nsf] Is the "Security Service Function (SSF)" in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases?

...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Migault Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 1:02 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Alireza Ranjbar; Linda Dunbar Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Is the "Security Service Function (SSF)" in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-probl

Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-xibassnez-i2nsf-capability

Support adoption. See my long email for details on what need to be change. Sue On 2 Nov 2016, at 20:31 , Linda Dunbar wrote: Dear WG: This email serves as a call for WG adoption of draft-xibassnez-i2nsf-capability as a WG

[I2nsf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-03.txt

, and then ask the WG chairs for WG LC. Sue Hares -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 3:23 PM To: Jaehoon Jeong; Susan Hares; Christian Jacquenet; Jaehoon Paul Jeong; Diego Lopez; Rakesh Kumar; i2nsf-cha

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

Linda: May I tentatively get a time slot for the Problem statement and use case? 5 minutes or less would be fine. Sue Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:33 AM To: 'i2nsf@ietf.org' Subject: Re: [I2nsf]

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

:52 AM To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised Sue, Sure. Are there any gating issues for moving it to WGLC? Linda From: Susan Hares [mailto:sha...@ndzh.com] Sent: 2016年11月3日 10:47 To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>;

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

John: I will be glad to do the terminology as well. I look forward to your slides. Sue From: John Strassner [mailto:straz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 6:26 PM To: Susan Hares; John Strassner Cc: Linda Dunbar; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF

Re: [I2nsf] Thoughts on draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring

Adrian: Why: Monitoring is a key component to I2NSF for monitoring NSF devices. Monitoring is not the same as NSF devices sending notifications - which is a push from the NSF devices. Monitoring may encompasses specific requests to the device. Monitoring is different than the DOTS - "help

Re: [I2nsf] IPR and draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases

Adrian: I do not have an IPR on this draft. Seu -Original Message- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 5:38 AM To: draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-ca...@ietf.org; ldun...@huawei.com;

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-06

Adrian: Thank you for the review. I will respond to each point later today. Sue -Original Message- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 9:09 AM To: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WGLC for

Re: [I2nsf] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Kathleen Please move this draft to 2 weeks from now.  I am sick today so I will not get these revisions done today.  Sue Hares  Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Kathleen Moriarty Date:

Re: [I2nsf] Last Call: (I2NSF Problem Statement and Use cases) to Proposed Standard

Ed: Thank you for this comment. I will make this change in version-12. I’ll wait a few days to see if additional comments are provided during IETF LC. Sue From: NetNull [mailto:netn...@hushmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 2:23 PM To: i...@ietf.org Cc: IETF-Announce;

Re: [I2nsf] AD review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases

Kathleen: Time is moving toward the deadline. I will check the abbreviations and grammar and submit this draft as a response. Sue -Original Message- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2017 6:41 PM To: 'Kathleen Moriarty

Re: [I2nsf] need some work to improve the consistency of I2NSF Information and data model: maybe a design team?

John: Let me propose something different. There are 2 priorities: 1) Priority 1 – something that fits the market, and provides easy reading by users 2) Priority 2 – something that is architecturally clean I understand you feel your base model is architecturally perfect.

Re: [I2nsf] Need volunteer for minutes taker for I2NSF WG session Tuesday 1:30pm -3:30pm

Linda: I’m glad to share the etherpad with Frank. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xialiang (Frank) Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 7:34 AM To: Linda Dunbar; i2nsf Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Need volunteer for minutes taker for I2NSF WG session Tuesday 1:30pm

Re: [I2nsf] need some work to improve the consistency of I2NSF Information and data model: maybe a design team?

[mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Strassner Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 1:30 PM To: Susan Hares; John Strassner Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar Subject: Re: [I2nsf] need some work to improve the consistency of I2NSF Information and data model: maybe a design team? Wow. I have

Re: [I2nsf] Aid from Yaov

Thank you Yoav! Sue From: Yoav Nir [mailto:ynir.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 10:34 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Aid from Yaov Sorry. Just saw your mail. Corrected. On 18 Jul 2017, at 15:00, Susan Hares <sha...@ndzh.com>

Re: [I2nsf] Well done: RFC 8192 on Interface to Network Security Functions (I2NSF): Problem Statement and Use Cases

+1 - 3 Cheers for the I2NSF WG. Adrian observed in our first meeting that this WG is one of the best working groups for collaboration! We have reached success together. Sue -Original Message- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Wednesday, July

Re: [I2nsf] Deborah Brungard's Abstain on draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-12: (with COMMENT)

Deborah: I asked Kathleen to move this one out 2 more weeks so that we could work through any issues you have with the document. Version 15 will take care of all other editorial comments. During the next few days or next Monday, perhaps we could chat on a phone call. I'm glad to change

Re: [I2nsf] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11: (with COMMENT)

Ekr: Thank you for your insightful comments. The track has been changed to informational in version 13. Your comments have been fixed in version 15 (or in earlier versions). Sue -Original Message- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla Sent:

Re: [I2nsf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-12: (with COMMENT)

Ben: I am dealing with the editorial comments you indicated. I am not dealing with the wider scope issues of information for support documents. Version 13 is submitted to fix these issues, and to change the draft's status to informational. Sue -Original Message- From: I2nsf

Re: [I2nsf] Is there any objection of merging the content from draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology to draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework draft?

Yoav and Adrian: I agree with you that split the terminology is not a good way to go. As a solution to Yoav's problem, may I suggest the following: 1) publish the terminology information in the framework document, 2) Keep a WG draft for terms that change - this can create a bis document for

Re: [I2nsf] Chairs

Diego would be a great co-chair. Sue Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Diego R. Lopez Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 7:03 PM To: Kathleen Moriarty Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; ; Eric Rescorla Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Chairs Hi Kathleen,

Re: [I2nsf] Next steps with Terminology draft

Adrian: Thank you for the feedback on the terminology draft. The authors will work to provide an update. Sue -Original Message- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 5:34 AM To: i2nsf@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [I2nsf] Call for adoption of draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection

Yoav: I have read the document in July and I listened to the discussion on the interim. Based on the information presented in the document and during the interim, I believe this document should be adopted as a working group draft. There is enough interest to continue to refining this

Re: [I2nsf] Need a scribe (taking minutes) for Tues I2NSF WG session

Linda: I will take notes on etherpad. Sue Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 4:02 AM To: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: [I2nsf] Need a scribe (taking minutes) for Tues I2NSF WG session We need volunteers to take

Re: [I2nsf] Document Action: 'Framework for Interface to Network Security Functions' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-10.txt)

Paul: I agree – this is a great achievement for the I2NSF WG. A bit thanks to the authors and to our WG Chairs (Linda and Yoav). Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:24 PM To: Yoav Nir Cc:

Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kim-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-data-model-04

Linda and I2NSF WG: I believe this drafts is ready for adoption. I have followed this draft since -00.txt. This draft has sound implementation experience behind it. Cheerily, Susan Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Friday, January

Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for I2NSF Registration Interface Data Model Draft

Linda: I have read this draft, and I support its adoption. Cheerily, Susan Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:55 PM To: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: SecCurator_Team; Yoav Nir Subject: [I2nsf

Re: [I2nsf] Start the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability

I2NSF WG and chairsz: As I author, I know of no IPR related to the I2NSF applicability draft. Cheerily, Susan Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 12:05 PM To: Linda Dunbar; Yoav Nir; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc

Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call on I2NSF Security PolicyTranslation Draft

___ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model

As a co-author, I know of no other IPR other than IPR already disclosed. None of my inputs to the capability data model draft had any IPR attached to it. As to IPR on this draft, I would expect a more licensing statement such as included in the following IPR.

Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-05.txt

Rafa and Yoav: [IDR co-chair hat on] and Caveat – I am not a IPSEC or security expert. >I don’t think it’s very useful for the controller to distribute a policy (SPD >entries) but no SAs (SAD entries) in the IKE-less case. It makes sense >in >the IKE case because the NSFs can then use

Re: [I2nsf] IPR Statements about I2NSF documents

I have no objection to this new version of the IPR statements. Sue Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Diego R. Lopez Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2019 7:34 PM To: Yoav Nir; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: Roman Danyliw Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IPR Statements about I2NSF documents

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-08

I have no knowledge of IPR related to this document. Cheerily, Susan Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 5:23 PM To: i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: Yoav Nir Subject: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing

Re: [I2nsf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with COMMENT)

Murray: Did our discussion regarding the history of the information model help resolve your concerns as well? Or do you have additional concerns that were not resolved? I believe that Benoit might have stated the Information model did the appropriate job by helping us form the data model.

Re: [I2nsf] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus: Do you have specific transport people that you have assigned to work on this review? It would probably be more effective to discuss these issues point by point with the reviewers. As Paul has indicated, we would like to your issues in the context of the high level capabilities of

Re: [I2nsf] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

additional history, please let me know. Susan Hares -Original Message- From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 5:19 AM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-mo...@ietf.org; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org; i2nsf@ietf.org; Linda

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-12

Linda: I am unaware of any IPR other than what has been disclosed. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 10:17 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WGLC

Re: [I2nsf] Fwd: AUTH48 [AP]: RFC 9061 NOW AVAILABLE

Diego: The title you proposed looks good to me. Cheers, Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Diego R. Lopez Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 10:47 AM To: Rafa Marin-Lopez; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: Roman Danyliw; Gabriel Lopez; Yoav Nir; Fernando Pereniguez-Garcia; Linda

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-110 I2NSF Hackathon Project

+1 Thanks for your work at Hackathon! Cheers, Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 6:43 PM To: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: skku-iotlab-members Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IETF-110 I2NSF Hackathon Project Paul

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06

Linda and Yoav: My apologies for the delay in sending in my IPR statement. I do not know of any undisclosed IPR for this draft. Cheerily, Susan Hares From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:jaehoon.p...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 12:28 PM To: Linda Dunbar; Yoav Nir

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-16

Linda and Paul: I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR on this draft. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 8:46 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Chaehong Chung; skku-iotlab-members; Mr. Jaehoon Paul

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-16

Tom: The WG consensus runs into the problems that there are 3 types of changes to the drafts: a) content additions/changes to model b) changes for refactoring of the yang models c) textual changes that do not impact the model. As mentioned in my response to Roman that it seems a)

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-16

! Sue -Original Message- From: Roman Danyliw [mailto:r...@cert.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 11:29 AM To: Susan Hares; 't petch'; 'Linda Dunbar'; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: 'Patrick Lingga'; 'Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong'; Roman Danyliw Subject: RE: [I2nsf] WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer

Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering

Roman: The orchestration in the original charter was seen as "Yang models". I'm glad to work the IP-SEC orchestration + Yang models where the work goes. Sue -Original Message- From: Roman Danyliw [mailto:r...@cert.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 9:20 AM To: S

Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering

ain - I am grateful to Paul and Tom Petch] Just giving you feedback from the trenches. Sue -Original Message- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 6:54 AM To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-char

Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering

9:51 AM To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering Hi Sue! > -Original Message- > From: Susan Hares > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 9:27 AM > To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-charte

Re: [I2nsf] Need note takers for Thurs I2NSF WG session at 13:00 Vienna time

I will take minutes. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 1:36 PM To: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: [I2nsf] Need note takers for Thurs I2NSF WG session at 13:00 Vienna time I2NSF participants, I2NSF Session will be

Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering

, March 24, 2022 7:22 AM To: Roman Danyliw; Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering On 22/03/2022 10:54, Roman Danyliw wrote: > Hi Sue! > >> -Original Message- >> From: Susan Hares >> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:35 PM >

Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering

Paul: I'm a bit lost about the last sentences. If you could explain "re-reading new IANA registry values creates by new RFCs. Thank you for your feedback, Sue -Original Message- From: Paul Wouters [mailto:p...@nohats.ca] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 5:34 PM To: Susan

Re: [I2nsf] Request for Comments, Interest and Support in I2NSF Re-Chartering

oss-area management as we head into 5G work. Security in all areas is key for 5G needs. -Original Message- From: t petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 5:05 AM To: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: Roman Danyliw; Panwei (William); Henk Birkholz; tom p

Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering

Roman: May I ask a questions before answering your questions. 1) How many security Yang models have been published? 2) How long does it take Yang models approved in the security area? 3) How many IETF yang models have been deployed? 4) Does the small deployment for IETF yang models change

Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering

s at draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-13.txt. -Original Message- From: Roman Danyliw [mailto:r...@cert.org] Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 5:03 PM To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering Hi Sue! > -Original Message- > From: I2nsf On Behal

[I2nsf] FW: Zahed's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model

Roman: This is an example of the hurdles placed in front of any Yang model. During the original creation gathering of information for the yang model, quic was not even a protocol. Cheers, Sue From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:jaehoon.p...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday,

Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm

Linda: I will review the document by Thursday (7/14) and send in a review of the document. Would you let me know what WG LC comments were not addressed? Cheers, Sue From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 1:17 PM To: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: [I2nsf] need more

Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm

Linda: Just to let you know, this review will into come until Monday. I have been overwhelmed by my work with the IDR WG - so my plans for this week went out the window. Sue From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 1:17 PM To: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: [I2nsf] need

Re: [I2nsf] IETF 114 I2NSF agenda uploaded

Linda: In the recharter discussion, is it appropriate to ask about specific items such as additions to ipsec work in I2NSF? I do not have a draft for this work. Sue From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2022 3:44 PM To: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: [I2nsf] IETF 114 I2NSF

Re: [I2nsf] IETF 114 I2NSF agenda uploaded

To: Susan Hares ; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: RE: IETF 114 I2NSF agenda uploaded Sue, Are you talking about IPsec between two trusted nodes? Something different from the IPsecme WG? Linda

Re: [I2nsf] IETF 114 I2NSF agenda uploaded

Paul: Thank you for the generous offer. Let me check with my co-authors. Sue From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 6:35 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: Diego R. Lopez ; Linda Dunbar ; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong ; i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IETF 114

Re: [I2nsf] IETF 114 I2NSF agenda uploaded

may be able to take this off the agenda. Sue From: Diego R. Lopez Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 11:48 AM To: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong ; Susan Hares Cc: Linda Dunbar ; i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IETF 114 I2NSF agenda uploaded Hi, I totally concur with Paul here. We

Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm

to save time on the agenda for me. I’ll talk to Paul and Diego directly. I will provide the full review by early morning on Tuesday. Sue From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Sent: Friday, July 22, 2022 12:14 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: Linda Dunbar ; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong ; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm

I will send in the review of the model by 8am on Tuesday. Sue From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 4:00 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: Linda Dunbar ; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong ; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf

Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm

Linda and I2NSF: Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-inteface-dm. Status: Ready to publish Textual Comments: The write-up for this data model has excellent clarity in the English text. Review Question: Right level of detail? Yes - Excellent choices on detail. One of the questions

Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm

it. Thanks! Sue From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 9:07 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: Roman Danyliw ; Linda Dunbar ; Yoav Nir ; i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members ; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Subject: Re: [I2nsf] need more review and support to close the WGLC for draft-ietf

Re: [I2nsf] Closing the I2NSF WG

Roman, Linda, and Paul: Thank you for all your hard work on I2NSF. Cheers, Sue From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2023 2:32 PM To: Roman Danyliw ; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; The IESG ; Yoav Nir ; Patrick Lingga ; skku-iotlab-members ; Younkyeong