On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Russ White ru...@riw.us wrote:
Characterizing every possible QoS model is practically impossible. Do you
have any standard model in mind that would be suitable to use as a base ?
I was thinking about something around the diffserv work, possibly RFC4594
Characterizing every possible QoS model is practically impossible. Do you
have any standard model in mind that would be suitable to use as a base ?
I was thinking about something around the diffserv work, possibly RFC4594
figures 3 or 7, perhaps. We might get someone who was more deeply
Sri,
I'm delighted to hear that some thought and progress is going on in this
area.
I agree that we'll want to have some templates (named objects) available.
I don't see
trying to standardize all of these mechanisms - though a core set of types
(policing, rate-limiting, queuing, etc) certainly
Russ,
Characterizing every possible QoS model is practically impossible. Do you
have any standard model in mind that would be suitable to use as a base ?
I would also be interested in hearing feedback on PBR. The 5 tuple based
classification seems to be the most basic. But additionally one could
