Re: [i2rs] WG LC confirmation on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology (3/7 to 3/21/2018)

2018-03-07 Thread Robert Wilton 

One quick comment (not a proper review):

I note that the extra state module in Appendix A is redefining features 
defined in the main module.  This isn't generically necessarily the 
wrong thing to do, but in this case it looks like they are not required 
in the state module (since they don't appear to be used), and would be 
best removed.


Thanks,
Rob


On 07/03/2018 17:25, Susan Hares wrote:


Greetings I2RS folks:

This is a 2 Week WG LC to confirm the WG LC on 
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology.   During this WG LC, please 
indicate any issues with the updates to align with Network Management 
Data Store Module.  These may include:


1)Yang data model structure,

2)High level Yang language format

3)Security consideration section,

4)Any issues with the notification calls.

If you feel this updated data model is ready for publication, please 
send indicate that in your response.


Cheerily, Susan Hares



___
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs


___
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

[i2rs] WG LC confirmation on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology (3/7 to 3/21/2018)

2018-03-07 Thread Susan Hares 
Greetings I2RS folks: 

 

This is a 2 Week WG LC to confirm the WG LC on
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology.   During this WG LC, please
indicate any issues with the updates to align with Network Management Data
Store Module.  These may include: 

 

1)  Yang data model structure, 

2)  High level Yang language format 

3)  Security consideration section, 

4)  Any issues with the notification calls.

 

If you feel this updated data model is ready for publication, please send
indicate that in your response. 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares 

 

 

___
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs