On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 20:03, C.W. Holeman II
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where does this go in the sugarlabs.org web site?
Or is it already there?
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Taxonomy assigns names to some of the things
on your diagram, but your diagram is probably worth putting on a
separate page.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tom, Bill and others,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:34:28PM -0500, Tom Hoffman wrote:
Scratch is, or should be a trademark.
[details snipped]
Mozilla has very strict terms for trademark use -- so much so that it
is called Iceweasel in Debian:
Hi Rob,
On this:
I already added some of these above things to the roadmap wiki page as
things to try and improve in 9.1.
I'm not sure I found the place where you recorded that.
Did you by any chance add it to the XO Feature Roadmap?
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap
There are some
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Robert McQueen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bernie, Brendan,
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Brendan R. Powers wrote:
I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit
more standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function
Hello,
I propose that we make sending out an agenda for all of our meeting a
required step. We was supposed to have a Deployment meeting today,
people came for it, but it didn't happen. That really sucks imo and we
should be careful about not repeating it.
I'm sure this will happen less often as
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Bill Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mitch Resnick responded to my query as follows. I replied by saying I was
not an expert on licensing and / or open source but that people on the IAEP
list (and Tom) would be certain to provide some useful feedback.
Hi Bill.
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Caroline Meeks wrote:
World wide there are many programmers paid to create and maintain
activities with strong pedagogical elements intended solely for kids.
Many of these activities are distributed without cost and some are open
source. Some that I'm familiar with are
This one was my fault. I got my times mixed up. In my defense, I did
post an agenda on the wiki in the meeting section of the Deployment
Team pages. Next week won't work for me as I'll be over the Atlantic,
but I will work with you to put together an agenda before hand.
@Marco, I guess the
Hello Marco.
Deployment meeting is scheduled for november 19, per:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/DeploymentTea/Meetings#2008-11-19_meeting
we will send an agenda before it happens, and agree with you, we should
always send an agenda before the meetings if not the meeting is not going.
cheers!.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Caroline Meeks wrote:
I'd like to help. Are you around Cambridge next week?
Absolutely. We're gonna have a lot to talk about. :)
--g
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello all. I'd like to have a formal kick-off
Thanks for the detailed analysis, Morgan. Much appreciated.
--g
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Morgan Collett wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 18:02, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Bill Kerr wrote:
Meaning what, exactly? Can you be more specific?
Well, it's
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 18:02, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Bill Kerr wrote:
Meaning what, exactly? Can you be more specific?
Well, it's meant to be possible for collaboration to work out of the box.
This did not happen with Wolfgang's Live CD
After lingering purgatory, aka Mozilla's Bugzilla, for the last couple
of months, the first set of patches to allow amo to serve Sugar
activities has made it into the upstream tree:-/
Looks like I can pick this back up.
david
___
IAEP -- It's An
BRILLIANT. Well done, David.
This is a Big Deal.
--g
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, David Farning wrote:
After lingering purgatory, aka Mozilla's Bugzilla, for the last couple
of months, the first set of patches to allow amo to serve Sugar
activities has made it into the upstream tree:-/
Looks
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 20:23 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 18:02, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Bill Kerr wrote:
Meaning what, exactly? Can you be more specific?
Well, it's meant to be possible for collaboration to work
Yup, congrats, David. That remembers me I have one patch in the
purgatory to take care of...
Regards,
Tomeu
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BRILLIANT. Well done, David.
This is a Big Deal.
--g
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, David Farning wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Caroline Meeks wrote:
World wide there are many programmers paid to create and maintain
activities with strong pedagogical elements intended solely for kids. Many
of these activities are
Bernie and I just took a look at the CIC spaces; they are beautiful. We're
using the same space for the Monday night hackathon (especially invited: new
contributors). I'll send out another email about that in a moment.
-Mel
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Aleksey Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just some thoughts and some practices (specific?) of Sugar packaging process
http://sugarlabs.org/go/DeploymentTeam/jhconvert
Sounds very very similar to what Guy (in cc) has been doing for debian!
Marco
Tickets 4, 5, 6, 12 should really be assigned to wiki or am I missing something?
Marco
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Might I suggest that you contact the Software Freedom Law Center? They
do stuff like this precisely. Trying to do a license without a lawyer
these days is like pinning a bull's eye on your project.
PJ
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tom, Bill and
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:16 AM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a heads up.
I moved ReleaseTeam to DevelopmentTeam/Release and deleted the related cruft.
Please let me know if anything major broke.
Thanks for taking care of it David!
Marco
In the interest of trying to make room for the unexpected around the
Nov 17 G1G1 launch, I've tried to compress most of the technical talks
into a single day, Wed. Nov 19. There will be plenty of flex time
during the rest of the week to get to topics not covered, delve in
depth, or try to hack
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:07 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this schedule seem reasonable to others? (Esp. those I've
pencilled in for talks?) If you are going to be in town, made a 9.1
proposal (or forgot to), and aren't listed above, let me know.
I should have also
Subject: [IAEP] Are you coming to Sugarcamp?
Unfortunately, won't make it. I will be in the Boston for much of
January. Is XOCamp still in the works following FUDCon? Tony Anderson
and I were both planning to attend.
--
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:11 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:07 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this schedule seem reasonable to others? (Esp. those I've
pencilled in for talks?) If you are going to be in town, made a 9.1
proposal
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4pm: Internationalization (Marco, C. Scott, possibly Saymindu by
phone and/or cjb on language learning)
I'm not giving talks about i18n :)
Marco
___
IAEP -- It's An
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:18 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like Bernie start a on-line schedule at
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Sugarcamp
Yes, Bernie and I are working together on this. I just thought I'd
post a proposal to the list in general to find out if I'm totally
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4pm: Internationalization (Marco, C. Scott, possibly Saymindu by
phone and/or cjb on language learning)
I'm not giving talks about i18n
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Samuel Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope there are gobby sessions for all events, and that they are more
brainstorming and writing than presentation and recording video.
No. Wednesday talks are well-structured, compressed data, idea, open
question and
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this schedule seem reasonable to others? (Esp. those I've
pencilled in for talks?) If you are going to be in town, made a 9.1
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:39 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Samuel Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope there are gobby sessions for all events, and that they are more
brainstorming and writing than presentation and recording video.
No.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if (a) I understand how Bernie's schedule (Talk:Sugarcamp)
works; but (b) Friday morning at 9am is the only time that works for
Evangelina, who is able to jooin us for the Portfolio discussion. I
don't think we'll
33 matches
Mail list logo
