Re: [IAEP] calendar

2009-02-13 Thread Simon Schampijer
David Farning-5 wrote: Well, It seems that using google calendar was a flop:( It just added another level of complexity without adding much value. I am planning on removing the meeting calanders and replacing them with a simple header like the deployment team uses at

Re: [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-13 Thread Simon Schampijer
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:09:02PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Ubuntu will sync their changes back to Debian as soon as we can; that is, as soon as

Re: [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-13 Thread Simon Schampijer
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 09:10:48AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:09:02PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: [...] we don't have many activities: to this we have two solutions:

Re: [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-13 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi David, On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, David Van Assche wrote: The problem is that 0.82 is not stable at all As said before, if there are problems related to particular packaging in Debian, please file bugs. (For example I still need to test whether read+write are really broken on

Re: [IAEP] Linuxtag 2009 - how do we want to promote Sugar Labs

2009-02-13 Thread Rita Freudenberg
Am 12.02.2009 um 12:41 schrieb Holger Levsen: Hi, On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote: I would like us to be present at LinuxTag (24-27 June 2009) [1]. What do you think about a shared booth with the german OLPC association, OLPC Deutschland e.V.? Hi all, while

[IAEP] Intro to non-profit finances.

2009-02-13 Thread David Farning
It is time to start formalizing the Sugar Labs finances. It has been a rather long process, but I am satisfied that we headed in the correct direction. BACKGROUND Typically, finance is one of the most difficult issues for non-profits. First, no one cares. After all, we are here to create a

Re: [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org

2009-02-13 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi, http://addons.sugarlabs.org is up and running. Please create accounts in there if you want to help in anything activity-related. Specifically, we need: - activity maintainers to upload their bundles, Thanks.

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-13 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:14 PM, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote: ok? I guess this will be contreversial but it must be said and acted upon (much more importantly) Im gonna try and make this easy: SoaS - the latest fedora core based I tried to impress my 9 year old gescwister...

Re: [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 04:04:36PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi David, On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, David Van Assche wrote: The problem is that 0.82 is not stable at all As said before, if there are problems related to particular

Re: [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org

2009-02-13 Thread Ivan Krstić
On Feb 13, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: http://addons.sugarlabs.org is up and running I expected this to be activities.sugarlabs.org, since the choice of 'addons' comes from Firefox and isn't part of the usual Sugar vocabulary, no? -- Ivan Krstić krs...@solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu |

Re: [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org

2009-02-13 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Yes, the original name was activities.sugarlabs.org, i find it much better.. Cheers! Rafael Ortiz On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Ivan Krstić krs...@solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu wrote: On Feb 13, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: http://addons.sugarlabs.org is up and running I

Re: [IAEP] addons.sugarlabs.org

2009-02-13 Thread Gary C Martin
On 14 Feb 2009, at 00:34, Ivan Krstić wrote: On Feb 13, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: http://addons.sugarlabs.org is up and running I expected this to be activities.sugarlabs.org, since the choice of 'addons' comes from Firefox and isn't part of the usual Sugar vocabulary, no? I

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] addons.sugarlabs.org

2009-02-13 Thread Gary C Martin
On 14 Feb 2009, at 00:54, Luke Faraone wrote: Addons is named as such because we expected to host other, non-activity content there, like content bundles. FWIW: Personally I see content bundles fading out over the short term, and being replaced by activities that are basically a minimal