I apologize. As a member of PlayPower, I will have to help them see
what is happening in Uruguay, that 400 K computers have been
delivered, albeit the issue of content useful for the classroom is not
yet solved there either.
On 11/8/09, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:33 PM, S
Elonex One clones are available right now for about $75 USD in
quantities over 100. They were released original well after the XO 1,
and have about similar hardware. Originally they sold for about $300.
The XO seems to be about the only one defying Moore's :-)
While the (heavily subsidized) pri
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr wrote:
> The non ASCII is a complication, but changing binaries was very popular
> in Brazil in the 1980s (the copyright law here was only extended to
> software in 1987).
I am argentine, and grew up "patching" binaries on the C=64. It's been
do
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Interesting. Though the challenge they have -- localising closed src
> binaries... to non ASCII-using locales -- is rather hard.
The non ASCII is a complication, but changing binaries was very popular
in Brazil in the 1980s (the copyright law here was only extended to
soft
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> On 07.11.2009, at 04:48, Bill Kerr wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:10, Bill Kerr wrote:
> >> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/browse/type:1/cat:107
> >>
there is unfortunately no shortage of very misinformed comment, e.g.:
http://www.timeslive.co.za/opinion/columnists/article182183.ece
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/04/pl
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/04/playpower-80s-computing-21st-century
Interesting. Though the challenge they have -- localising closed src
binaries... to non ASCII-using locales -- is rather hard.
Hard not to note the very misin
Caroline Meeks wrote:
> Anyone know these guys?
I had a chat with them.
> I wonder how feasible it would be down the road to share content.
> The games they are porting seem like they would also be good for Sugar.
All you need is a NES (Nitendo Entertainment System) emulator as a Sugar
activity
Anyone know these guys? I wonder how feasible it would be down the road to
share content. The games they are porting seem like they would also be good
for Sugar.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/04/playpower-80s-computing-21st-ce
On Saturday 07 November 2009 09:18:05 am Bill Kerr wrote:
> No but it should be there since Scratch has a far better UI than Etoys
I have seen kids play with both Scratch and Etoys and I wouldn't pit them
against each other. They appeal to different sets of children.
Scratch appeals to a younger
On 07.11.2009, at 04:48, Bill Kerr wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:10, Bill Kerr wrote:
>> > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/browse/type:1/cat:107
>> > How come scratch is no longer available for sugar?
>> > (the link is
11 matches
Mail list logo
