Another suggestions from -Sur.
Geogebra and Wikibrowse.
cheers!
Rafael Ortiz
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Claudia Urrea wrote:
> What about SocialCalc? I use it with measure to graph the data collected. It
> can also be used to do any kind of budget, etc. People use it.. and they are
> p
What about *SocialCalc*? I use it with measure to graph the data collected.
It can also be used to do any kind of budget, etc. People use it.. and they
are planning to release a new version with Spanish localization.
All my XOs have *VNC launcher*... I use it during workshops or demos, but I
could
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 07:40:26PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
* Backup up by the community *
The proposer of the feature has to get feedback from the community.
This includes technical feedback, feedback from the deployments etc.
See as well in the last paragraph about which points the com
Dear Sugar community,
the Feature policy [1] has been updated.
* Why this process *
Let me quote the first paragraph to exaplin what this policy is for:
"The main goal of the feature process is to phrase out the ideas on how
Sugar should evolve that are floating around in the community. These c
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:56:42PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:55:20AM -0600, David Farning wrote:
>> > Many of the discussion about this have stalled because of confusion
>> > over what aspect the stack we are tryin
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:56:42PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:55:20AM -0600, David Farning wrote:
> > Many of the discussion about this have stalled because of confusion
> > over what aspect the stack we are trying to define.
> >
> > As a starting point, I would sugges
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:55:20AM -0600, David Farning wrote:
> It seems time to think about the next _big_ technical issue for
> growing Sugar Labs. Clearly articulating the Sugar Stack. For the
> last year or so, we have been circling the issue with talk of stable
> APIs, Glucose, Fructose, an
very helpful Jim thanks!
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Jim Simmons wrote:
> Sean,
>
> Check out the Children's Library here:
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/iacl
>
> There are several books in Arabic, Farsi, and other languages. The
> top rated Arabic books are short, well illustrated, an
Dear Sugar Community,
I am proud to present you the Sucrose 0.88 Schedule [1]!
* Dates *
We keep the time based 6 months release cycle. Final release will be:
31rd of March 2010. We basically have the same dates as GNOME. Those
dates are made in conjunction with the various distributions. So we
Sean,
Check out the Children's Library here:
http://www.archive.org/details/iacl
There are several books in Arabic, Farsi, and other languages. The
top rated Arabic books are short, well illustrated, and aimed at young
children so they might be good choices in DJVU format. Some
possibilities:
It seems time to think about the next _big_ technical issue for
growing Sugar Labs. Clearly articulating the Sugar Stack. For the
last year or so, we have been circling the issue with talk of stable
APIs, Glucose, Fructose, and expected dependencies.
Last year, we created the release cycle. At
Many thanks for these suggestions!
We have English, French, German, Bengali, and Italian suggestions.
Sebastian - I will collate the files for you.
I thought I found a nice Dutch title here
(http://www.geheugenvannederland.nl/?/en/items/PRB01:811205169/&p=1&i=1&st=Gouden%20Vlinders&sc=%28cql.serv
On 27.11.2009, at 02:15, Tim McNamara wrote:
> Max & Moritz is in the public domain. It would be a wonderful addition to the
> collection, if possible. Does anyone know whether it is available?
Excellent suggestion! It's here:
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/17161
- Bert -
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:50, Danny Kodicek
wrote:
> Hi, Tomeu, thanks for your reply
>
>> > 1) Screen resolution
>> > The biggest problem we have is that the screen res of the XO seems
>> > unnecessarily high and can't be changed. This leads to two
>> big problems, one
>> > of readibility (whic
14 matches
Mail list logo
