On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
(oops, wrong subject)
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set.
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:37:09AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
(oops, wrong subject)
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about
Caroline,
Sorry to confuse you with Caryl. Don't know why I did that.
I'll try making up a Fedora 12 CD and booting from it. As I
understand it, your idea is simply to see if I can boot the Fedora
Live CD, not that this would be an alternative way to boot SoaS
Blueberry.
I was able to boot
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 00:56, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 4 Jan 2010, at 23:11, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Caryl,
On 4 Jan 2010, at 19:33, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
Hi Gary, (a fellow Mac person... yea!)
I really want to do the Live CD rather than the USB version of SoaS... due
Hi all,
Background:
Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other
FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar
stimulates(at least should) doing not just using, our audience could
have additional layers - teachers for examples. Projects
Aleksey Lim wrote:
So, the question is should we have special place to treat such issues
in convenient and casual developer/requester friendly manner.
-1
1. Fragmentation is bad. We should instead attempt to unify our
development sites under an interface that is both friendly to novices and
Excellent suggestion!
+1
Tomeu
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 17:50, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Background:
Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other
FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar
stimulates(at least
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Background:
Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other
FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar
stimulates(at least should) doing not just using, our
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:58:17AM -0500, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Aleksey Lim wrote:
So, the question is should we have special place to treat such issues
in convenient and casual developer/requester friendly manner.
-1
1. Fragmentation is bad. We should instead attempt to unify
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:16:29PM -0500, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Aleksey Lim wrote:
collab.sl.o shouldn't be
development site but central point there devs, users, doers, educators
meet. Thus it shouldn't dublicate sites like wiki/track/etc.
What do you mean by meet? Are you
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:05:31PM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Background:
Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other
FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 06:15:46PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
I personally like what Greg Smith did back at OLPC:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_requests
does anyone know the right ml link for
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap#Overview -- now it points to
12 matches
Mail list logo
