As promised, I kicked our agenda items forward. Turns out you can do a
lot without needing to vote. :)
Our meetbot does some truly awful meeting minutes formatting, but here's
the summary of
http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100711_0446.html:
* Local Labs TM applications
(from the last SLOBs agenda-kickin',
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-July/011343.html)
Question from Kevin Mark: Who should be the deciding organization for
who determines what version of sugar is used in the field?
I was confused about the hierarchy of who should be the deciding
From the last SLOBs agenda-kicking,
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-July/011343.html:
What are the rights and responsibilities of a SL project? (This should
be a simple answer, but we need to agree on the same simple answer.)
Right now, we have
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Mel Chua m...@melchua.com wrote:
Mel's response: To me, this is very clear - SL decides what version(s)
of Sugar it will support, and deployments will decide what version(s) of
Sugar they will use.
Exactly. That's a huge part of the Free in FOSS.
We can all
Speaker's PDF slides:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/File:OLPC_2010Jul11VirtuaFieldTrip.pdf
Please join us in 2 hrs (4PM Sunday, Eastern Time in Boston/NYC) by calling:
+1 (712) 432-3030
Conference Code: 637497
Live Chat Backchannel:
http://forum.laptop.org/chat (that's *#olpc-help*
El Sun, 11-07-2010 a las 07:24 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
[...]
How reasonable does this sound to everyone? Amendments? Changes? If you
want to make substantial edits, please throw this on a wiki page and
send us all the link. ;)
Thanks for taking the time to write this, Mel. I have no
Hi Again, Dinko,
Well, here goes on the big lesson 4.0. I finished checking it just as the World
Cup match was about to start so, I will write this during the dull moments...
if there are any!
This time... I'll do suggestions in red italics and additions in plain red.
Caryl
El Sun, 11-07-2010 a las 06:54 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
Our meetbot does some truly awful meeting minutes formatting, but here's
the summary of
http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100711_0446.html:
It was a wonderful SLOBs un-meeting, we should have more of these!
*
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Sun, 11-07-2010 a las 06:54 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
Our meetbot does some truly awful meeting minutes formatting, but here's
the summary of
This is fine with me, but we never formally approved the earlier
requests due to a lack of policy at the time. I had forwarded three
requests (Chile, Argentina, and Paraguay) to the list with the subject
[TM REQUEST]. Not sure why these requests are considered lost. I'd
like to formally
10 matches
Mail list logo
