Hi,
we are working on a project getting Sugar running on a tablet (Pegatron Lucid).
The tablet has an intel processor, Sugar is running on Fedora 14. We only had
few activities after the installation, but imported them later and most of them
are working. Now it is getting interesting. On a
Plan Ceibal in Uruguay is using an onscreen keyboard for accessibility. I
believe it is part of the Dextrose version of Sugar. You can go to the
Control Panel on the XO to activate the accessibility controls.
Regards,
Nick Doiron
On Wed, April 20, 2011 11:56 am, Rita Freudenberg wrote:
Hi,
Hi All
Is there a link that tells what is included (Sugar Activities, Gnome(?)) etc.
on each build of SoaS? I poked around a bit on the Sugar Labs wiki, but
couldn't find it.
Thanks!Caryl ___
IAEP -- It's An
Hi Rita,
On 20 Apr 2011, at 16:56, Rita Freudenberg wrote:
Hi,
we are working on a project getting Sugar running on a tablet (Pegatron
Lucid). The tablet has an intel processor, Sugar is running on Fedora 14. We
only had few activities after the installation, but imported them later and
Hi Caryl,
On 20 Apr 2011, at 17:17, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
Hi All
Is there a link that tells what is included (Sugar Activities, Gnome(?)) etc.
on each build of SoaS? I poked around a bit on the Sugar Labs wiki, but
couldn't find it.
Have been looking at SoaSv5-20110415-i686.iso in
Caryl Bigenho wrote:
Hi All
Is there a link that tells what is included (Sugar Activities, Gnome(?)) etc.
on each build of SoaS? I poked around a bit on the Sugar Labs wiki, but
couldn't find it.
Thanks!Caryl
1-)Soas v1 strawberry thru Soas v4 (sorry it so hard to
If you have time before tomorrow's meeting, please take a look at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html
regards.
-walter
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
AFAIK (please correct me) Uruguay is not providing code, thus in
violation of GNU license, and this situation has not been solved after
several years.
With GPL 3 will the Uruguay security code be considered a System Library
and thus exempt from providing code? That might be an elegant way out
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK (please correct me) Uruguay is not providing code, thus in violation
of GNU license, and this situation has not been solved after several years.
This is a serious accusation. Can you please provide some backup?
my apologies, that didn t work. Ill see in my other computer
2011/4/20, Yama Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com:
A, Walter, plz google sugar uruguay gpl compliant
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20 2011, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
AFAIK (please correct me) Uruguay is not providing code, thus in
violation of GNU license, and this situation has not been solved after
several years.
Which code are you talking about?
With GPL 3 will the Uruguay security code be considered
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 21:05 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
BTW, and regarding that, what's the point of having a license if such clear
violation just go like that forever? we all know that the desire that kids
would do stuff with source just hasn't happened so much (I agree with Martin
On 04/20/2011 08:05 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Yamandu Ploskonkayamap...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK (please correct me) Uruguay is not providing code, thus in violation
of GNU license, and this situation has not been solved after several years.
This is a serious
The excuse I was given by people who believe know more about this than I
do is that code (source code) was not released because of security
concerns - prevent stolen laptops, etc.
If you are correct that their code is plainly visible in the images, and
those can be seen en clair, then I agree
14 matches
Mail list logo
