Hi Sebastian,
Robert Fadel at OLPC may be able to answer your question
Sean
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Sebastian Silva
sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote:
Hi,
Several GNU+Linux distributions are forced to ship de-branded versions of
Firefox because of their trademark.
I could only find
You may want to ask on the olpc list. Also, what is relevance of the
Firefox reference?
I understand that because firefox logo is trademark, so, and example of what
have to be done if you uses software in wich that kind logos is embeded.
In the case of firefox branded web-browswer some
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Cristian Paul Peñaranda Rojas
p...@kristianpaul.org wrote:
You may want to ask on the olpc list. Also, what is relevance of the
Firefox reference?
I understand that because firefox logo is trademark, so, and example of what
have to be done if you uses software
El 17/10/11 08:28, Walter Bender escribió:
Iceweasel was a rebranding of Firefox in response to a specific issue
Mozilla had with Debian regarding unapproved patches. By bringing it
up as the lead-in to his question, I can only assume that Sebastian is
suggesting that there is some looming issue
it feels so silly to be thinking for permission to use the XO logo,,
...something must be really wrong
Kiko Mayorga
i+d ata/escuelab.org
2011/10/17 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Cristian Paul Peñaranda Rojas
p...@kristianpaul.org wrote:
You
No need to panic!
We can and use the logo [in the Sugar interface].
I was wondering if we can modify it and distribute modified versions of it
like we did before (maybe we shouldn't have?):
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 23:52 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all!
The following services will be inaccessible for planned maintenance.
For one hour starting from 2011-10-18 03:00 UTC.
cas.sugarlabs.org
cgit.sugarlabs.org
git.sugarlabs.org
chat.sugarlabs.org
