Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-16 Thread Samuel Greenfeld
But I intentionally gave the very simple examples... While RHEL/CentOS (and many other open source/commercial hybrid projects) rebrand their free versions because a complete replacement causes obvious confusion, these projects themselves include many products with trademarked names. Should Sugar

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-16 Thread Sebastian Silva
On 16/09/17 18:19, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > > By this measure, are we implying that Fedora & CentOS cannot be > distributed because they contain trademarks owned by Red Hat, and > Ubuntu cannot be distributed because it contains the name and logos > owned by Canonical? Your questions are spot

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-16 Thread Walter Bender
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > I agree with Sameer; if we want to debate this, this really needs a > lawyer's opinion. Either that or just asking OLPC Inc. what they consider > acceptable. > In fact, getting a lawyer's opinion is exactly what

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-16 Thread Samuel Greenfeld
I agree with Sameer; if we want to debate this, this really needs a lawyer's opinion. Either that or just asking OLPC Inc. what they consider acceptable. Sugar has been using the XO logo for approximately 11 years now. My non-lawyer opinion is that if someone was to complain, they would be

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-16 Thread Sebastian Silva
On 15/09/17 09:12, Walter Bender wrote: > (A2) Sugar Artwork, including the xo-computer icon, is currently > licensed under the GPL and we would like our downstream users to be > able to use all of our artwork under the terms of that license. As far > as the use of any trademark image outside of

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-16 Thread Laura Vargas
2017-09-16 7:42 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender : > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Laura Vargas > wrote: > >> Walter, >> >> I guess my question was not clear. My question is about the procedure to >> address legal issues to Conservancy. >> >> The

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-16 Thread Walter Bender
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Laura Vargas wrote: > Walter, > > I guess my question was not clear. My question is about the procedure to > address legal issues to Conservancy. > > The procedure you (SLOB) follow the first time you want to address > Conservancy was to

[IAEP] ...and today is Software Freedom Day! Celebrate SFD on Saturday 16 September 2017!

2017-09-16 Thread Laura Vargas
*Happy Software Freedom Day Sugar Labs Community!* Today we celebrate! Hoy estamos celebrando! It was on September 19, 2009 on a SFD day at Lima (Perú) that I heard the Free/Libre call for the first time. Sebastian's talk was called "Pedagogy of the Oppressed: Software for Liberation". It was

[IAEP] Translation platform for Sugarizer

2017-09-16 Thread Lionel Laské
Hi all, What if Sugarizer [1] - a taste of Sugar on any device - could be localized in your own language? To simplify translation efforts from the community, I've unified all source files to localize for Sugarizer (Sugarizer core, Sugarizer website, including activities and the future