in line thoughts below.
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Lionel Laské
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> BTW I'm agree with Caryl, the idea is to use this "honorarium" to defray
> his costs. Not considering it as a payment/salary/reward.
> I'm not at all a big fan of the use of word "honorarium", it's not the
>
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:32 PM Lionel Laské
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> BTW I'm agree with Caryl, the idea is to use this "honorarium" to defray
> his costs. Not considering it as a payment/salary/reward.
> I'm not at all a big fan of the use of word "honorarium", it's not the
> philosophy of SugarLabs t
+1
BTW I'm agree with Caryl, the idea is to use this "honorarium" to defray
his costs. Not considering it as a payment/salary/reward.
I'm not at all a big fan of the use of word "honorarium", it's not the
philosophy of SugarLabs to giving money to someone to represent SugarLabs.
It's even dangerou
