On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 12:04 -0500, Mel Chua wrote:
> MOTION: Yes, "Sugar on a Stick" should be reserved by Sugar Labs for
> use by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed
> effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement, and
> process is put in place: SoaS will
And the motion passes! FOR THE WIN!
MOTION: Yes, "Sugar on a Stick" should be reserved by Sugar
Labs for use by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can
be marketed effectively, until such time when a trademark
policy, agreement, and process is put in place: SoaS will be
aye.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
> Reminder, this was for question 3 of the Decision Panel.
>
> I vote aye to this motion.
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 17:09, Chris Ball wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > MOTION:
Reminder, this was for question 3 of the Decision Panel.
I vote aye to this motion.
Sean
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 17:09, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > MOTION: Yes, "Sugar on a Stick" should be reserved by Sugar Labs
>> > for use by
It's up for a vote. So far we have two 'aye' votes (mchua, cjb), and
need 2 more to pass.
>> MOTION: Yes, "Sugar on a Stick" should be reserved by Sugar Labs for use
>> by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed
>> effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement
second.
-walter
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
> After an extended post-SLOBs discussion in #sugar, SeanDaly, cjb,
> walterbender, sdziallas, myself (and possibly others I've missed -
> tomeu, bernie, and dave_b contributed to the earlier discussion) came up
> with a motion to
