On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Lionel Laské wrote:
>
> There is no issue here but it's interesting to see that you've decided to
> publicly mailing this without giving the complete Adam explanation.
>
> Here's the missing part:
>
>
> *Sugar Labs has approved "$550
There is no issue here but it's interesting to see that you've decided to
publicly mailing this without giving the complete Adam explanation.
Here's the missing part:
*Sugar Labs has approved "$550 towards local transport" from GSoC funds:*