Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-22 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
According to the result of this motion, sugar-artwork repository should be updated. Gonzalo On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Samuel Greenfeld > wrote: > >> I agree with Sameer; if we

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] motion to approve travel advance

2017-09-20 Thread Sameer Verma
+1 Sameer On Sep 20, 2017 8:29 AM, "Laura Vargas" wrote: > +1 > > I just want to make sure Samson is not going to be under unnecessary > stress or risks just because of "saving money" in his itinerary. > > > Regards and blessings > > Laura V > > 2017-09-20 10:15

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] motion to approve travel advance

2017-09-20 Thread Laura Vargas
+1 I just want to make sure Samson is not going to be under unnecessary stress or risks just because of "saving money" in his itinerary. Regards and blessings Laura V 2017-09-20 10:15 GMT-05:00 Adam Holt : > Attention SFConservancy, Bradley Kuhn & Martin Michlmayr, > > +1

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-16 Thread Walter Bender
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > I agree with Sameer; if we want to debate this, this really needs a > lawyer's opinion. Either that or just asking OLPC Inc. what they consider > acceptable. > In fact, getting a lawyer's opinion is exactly what

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-15 Thread Lionel Laské
+1 for the motion. @Martin, thanks to wait for all votes or at least the end of voting delay. Lionel. 2017-09-15 20:47 GMT+02:00 Adam Holt : > I greatly support the gist of Walter's motion, and but before I vote would > like clarification: > > In order to fully

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-15 Thread Sameer Verma
Hi Caryl, Free and open source software projects allow for forking by design as a way out of major disagreements. However if this disagreement is due to an intellectual property issue (as it appears to be in the current discussion), it is best handled by our legal counsel. Most of us are not

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOB motion

2017-06-01 Thread Samson Goddy
On Jun 1, 2017 1:28 PM, "Adam Holt" wrote: On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Samson Goddy wrote: > This would set a terrible precedent for Sugar Labs to pay $800 for a visa > alone. > > Flight and other things connected. > > All for the sake of 1 visa

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOB motion

2017-06-01 Thread Adam Holt
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Samson Goddy wrote: > This would set a terrible precedent for Sugar Labs to pay $800 for a visa > alone. > > Flight and other things connected. > > All for the sake of 1 visa alone, let's hope it happens (sorry you're flying instead of

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOB motion

2017-06-01 Thread Samson Goddy
Hi adam, I want to clarify some things with you. On Jun 1, 2017 11:50 AM, "Adam Holt" wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Walter Bender wrote: I'd like to queue up this motion before our monthly meeting on Friday: Motion: Allocate $800 towards

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOB motion

2017-06-01 Thread Adam Holt
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > I'd like to queue up this motion before our monthly meeting on Friday: > > Motion: Allocate $800 towards the expenses associated with Samson Goddy > presenting Sugar at the Scratch Conference in Bordeaux, France in