On 4 June 2016 at 08:08, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Tony Anderson wrote:
>>
>> I second the motion and approve it.
>
>
> I hope we all work together to find a way to compromise, but in any case my
> opinion is already well-known, as
Motion regarding GSoC mentoring stipends
Motion: Whereas it is the general policy of Sugar Labs to retain all GSoC
mentoring stipends in the General Fund, if a mentor asks a GSoC Admin (for
example in 2016, Walter or Lionel) to pay a stipend to a mentor, their
share of the stipend amount will be
+1 from me as well
(I had reclused myself from voting on the earlier version of this motion
due to a conflict of interest in that I am a potential recipient of the
funds, but since I have said that I will not accept the funds for my
personal use, I think it is OK to vote.)
-walter
On Mon, Jun
+ 1
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Tony Anderson wrote:
> I second the motion and approve it.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 06/04/2016 03:02 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>
> We did not have time to take action on two motions at yesterday's meeting.
> Please review the motion below. If
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Tony Anderson wrote:
> I second the motion and approve it.
>
I hope we all work together to find a way to compromise, but in any case my
opinion is already well-known, as stated a month ago:
Mentors/tutors/teachers are insufficiently