Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 15:37, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I presume there's a defined amount of people on this panel. When and
where is the chosen panel announced?
It's being discussed right now in the SLOBS meeting in #sugar-meeting.
Oops. I seem to
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:33:45AM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
4. We will entrust the marketing team with labeling products in a way
that is amenable to all parties, including the users and creators of
Sugar-based systems. The Marketing team is, and has been, responsible for
ensuring
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Mon, 21-09-2009 a las 10:14 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
Yes, the most obvious path is to be based on the next CentOS major
release, which in turn will be based on Fedora 11 (AFAIK).
Switching to other distros
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 06:41, Bill Bogstad bogs...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
.
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a
El Mon, 21-09-2009 a las 10:14 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
Yes, the most obvious path is to be based on the next CentOS major
release, which in turn will be based on Fedora 11 (AFAIK).
Switching to other distros with LTS is of course possible but then it
will be most probably carried out
For long-term security and support, we could adopt the Linux model: push
this concern down to the distributors and let them do a profitable
business out of it.
This creates a sustainable market for Sugar. Linux distributors who
have successfully built a reputation for offering good
2009/9/20 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer panel, but I'd
like to offer my viewpoint on this issue.
I agree and I also feel that we have consensus on those 2 things (SL
should promote SoaS, SL should treat distributors equally).
The
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a Stick a particular
release of a particular
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
Anonymous
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:24:42
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
Right, that's why the longer names such as Debian Sugar on a Stick
would refer to
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I
Philippe Clérié wrote:
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I sympathize since I'm also a
13 matches
Mail list logo
