Could you let the invited user in a chroot by default and only allow
full access if the inviting user explicitly allows it?
2009/8/6 Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu:
Gary C Martin wrote:
How are two (or more!) remote individuals expected to co-operate and
share the same command
Lucian Branescu wrote:
Could you let the invited user in a chroot by default and only allow
full access if the inviting user explicitly allows it?
1. What sort of interface do you have in mind? What is more explicit than
Share with: My Neighborhood?
2. Why a chroot, and not Rainbow?
3. How
Share with: My Neighborhood is too broad to allow full access. But
Share with: John should be enough to assume that you trust John. Or
instead have a separate option Share with: John (full acces).
A chroot because afaik rainbow doesn't really work outside the XO
distro My impression may be wrong,
Lucian Branescu wrote:
Share with: My Neighborhood is too broad to allow full access. But
Share with: John should be enough to assume that you trust John. Or
instead have a separate option Share with: John (full acces).
Sugar does support direct Invitations for private sharing. I like the
Lucian, Ben:
Here are a bunch of reactions. Apologies for the delay. :)
Michael
Lucian Branescu wrote:
A chroot because afaik rainbow doesn't really work outside the XO
distro My impression may be wrong, though.
Would you mind taking a look at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Rainbow
for
