On 13 April 2013 15:37, wrote:
> > 1 Android kernel + Ported linux libraries + Sugar
> > 2 Android kernel + Datastore/Collaboration replacement + Sugar rewritten
> in
> > HTML
> > 3 Full Android + Datastore/Collaboration replacement + Sugar activities
> > rewritten in HTML
> > 4 Full Android + Da
> 1 Android kernel + Ported linux libraries + Sugar
> 2 Android kernel + Datastore/Collaboration replacement + Sugar rewritten in
> HTML
> 3 Full Android + Datastore/Collaboration replacement + Sugar activities
> rewritten in HTML
> 4 Full Android + Datastore/Collaboration replacement + Sugar activ
On 13 April 2013 06:11, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:25:46AM +0800, Martin Dengler wrote:
> > I bet someone (cscott?) has already investigated [porting Sugar to
> > Android]
>
> Answering myself:
> http://www.google-melange.com/gci/work/download/google/gci2012/7972209?id=170
On 13 April 2013 03:21, wrote:
> The issue of the considerable resources required to transition to Android
> has been raised. Is there any possibility of getting financial support from
> Google or Samsung etc for the project?
>
Maybe the board could investigate if there are any financial support
On 13 April 2013 06:11, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:25:46AM +0800, Martin Dengler wrote:
> > I bet someone (cscott?) has already investigated [porting Sugar to
> > Android]
>
> Answering myself:
> http://www.google-melange.com/gci/work/download/google/gci2012/7972209?id=170
On 13 April 2013 03:21, wrote:
> I would like to see all these questions discussed further. I would like
> the technical implementation discussions to be more contextualised in terms
> of user experience.
>
Hi Tony,
let me try contextualize, for what I know so far.
I think these are the possib
; just observing that there is room
> for improvement and perhaps we should ask the real "power users" what they
> think.
>
> Really sorry if anyone is offended.
> Caryl
>
>
>
> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:10:18 +0800
> From: mar...@martindengler.com
> To: for
Martin
Sorry, compatibility not transition.
Tony
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:21:26AM +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> > Thanks to everybody who has contributed to the discussion so far,
> > particularly to Sean for his well researched post on Android
> > developments.
> >
> > The choice
artindengler.com
To: fors...@ozonline.com.au; fors...@mail.ozonline.com.au
CC: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar future
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:21:26AM +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> Thanks to everybody who has contributed
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:25:46AM +0800, Martin Dengler wrote:
> I bet someone (cscott?) has already investigated [porting Sugar to
> Android]
Answering myself:
http://www.google-melange.com/gci/work/download/google/gci2012/7972209?id=17001
> Martin
Martin
pgp3CDC48aVFd.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:21:26AM +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> Thanks to everybody who has contributed to the discussion so far,
> particularly to Sean for his well researched post on Android
> developments.
>
> The choices as I understand:
> 0) Do not have an Android transition plan
Thanks to everybody who has contributed to the discussion so far, particularly
to Sean for his well researched post on Android developments.
The choices as I understand:
0) Do not have an Android transition plan
1) A suite of Activities with a common look and feel but leave things like file
mana
+1 (in spirit to fixing challenges with Sugar as a FLOSS community)
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> I've not closely followed all these discussions, so obviously I'm
> not in the best position to provide good arguments, but here is my
> gut feeling about this.
>
>
On 13 April 2013 01:36, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hi Anish,
>
> that's interesting.
>
> First impressions from a quick look. There isn't really much documentation
> so I won't promise this is fully accurate :)
>
> Ubuntu is running in a chroot on the top of a modified android kernel.
> That's a bit
Hi Sean,
I've not closely followed all these discussions, so obviously I'm
not in the best position to provide good arguments, but here is my
gut feeling about this.
I see three challenges: put Sugar in the hands of many kids, build
a healthy FLOSS community, raise funds. The latter is just a me
Hi Anish,
that's interesting.
First impressions from a quick look. There isn't really much documentation
so I won't promise this is fully accurate :)
Ubuntu is running in a chroot on the top of a modified android kernel.
That's a bit of an hack and I wouldn't recommend it if we had to maintain
t
.sugarlabs.org; fors...@ozonline.com.au;
sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; ma...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar future (was Re: Re: [DESIGN] Single
instance activities)
On 12 April 2013 22:52, Sean DALY wrote:
The initial work seems very encouraging, yet it seems Sugar Labs doesn&#
s...@ozonline.com.au;
sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; ma...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar future (was Re: Re: [DESIGN] Single
instance activities)
On 12 April 2013 22:52, Sean DALY wrote:
The initial work seems very encouraging, yet it seems Sugar Labs doesn't
curren
Hi Daniel, et. al.,
Do you think Ubuntu could be an (easier) option for sugar to piggyback
upon...
This is not a because-i-think-ubuntu-is-cool opinion, but testament to the
fact that canonical have been working to get ubuntu running on tablets and
smartphones.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Nexus7/Ins
On 12 April 2013 22:52, Sean DALY wrote:
> The initial work seems very encouraging, yet it seems Sugar Labs doesn't
> currently have the resources to make an Android offer available anytime
> soon. But: now is the time. I believe fundraising is vital to achieve this
> goal, at the very least to f
Daniel - thanks for that
cc'ing the IAEP list, since the topic of the future of Sugar is I believe
of general interest to developer and non-developer contributors alike.
Porting Sugar to Android was identified at the beginning of the year by the
Oversight Board as a strategic goal for Sugar Labs.
21 matches
Mail list logo
