On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 13:03, James Zakijames.z...@gmail.com wrote:
With regards to the speed issue.
I tried SoaS on a USB2.0 (but not high-speed) memory-stick, performance was
hideous on a macbook.
Using a USB2.0 high-speed memory-stick, performance is great on an eeepc,
which has 1G Ram. I
With regards to the speed issue.
I tried SoaS on a USB2.0 (but not high-speed) memory-stick, performance was
hideous on a macbook.
Using a USB2.0 high-speed memory-stick, performance is great on an eeepc,
which has 1G Ram. I know its not small, but its all I have to compare with
for now.
So from
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm I'm not sure a BIOS will be wiling to boot from a USB port on a
card. However, combined with a CD boot helper might do the trick.
I have to use the CD at this point anyway. My goal is to have it boot more
quickly and
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Caroline Meeks
carol...@solutiongrove.comwrote:
Let me echo Caryl's question. Do we have a page with tasks for new
volunteers?
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/TODO has been restored and is
ready to be updated, perhaps restructured to cover this
When it come to older pcs, it really makes sense to try and use LTSP. We
have created a kiwi-ltsp usb stick for openSUSE, which gives a portable ltsp
server wherever u plug it in. In most cases it would make sense for this to
be the most powerful computer. It is as easy as installing the sugar and
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:24 PM, David Van Asschedvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
When it come to older pcs, it really makes sense to try and use LTSP. We
have created a kiwi-ltsp usb stick for openSUSE, which gives a portable ltsp
server wherever u plug it in. In most cases it would make sense for
That's a good point, and I understand the thinking behind it, as if you are
not 'changing' anything in an existing setup, people are less afraid that
things might go terribly wrong. That's the reason we have ltsp on a usb
stick... because you can stick in a server, and test it without installing
Thanks David great explanation.
and David, I totally agree that LTSP is the right technical solution for
this computer lab. Next year, perhaps we will have the level of trust and
political clout to implement it.
There is yet another reason I want to know if we can speed up these
computers and
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:24 PM, David Van Asschedvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
When it come to older pcs, it really makes sense to try and use LTSP. We
LTSP is an excellent path. Note that a happy LTSP adventure is
conditional on a good network infra and a decent TS machine. Wireless
won't do.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:38 PM, David Van Asschedvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a good point, and I understand the thinking behind it, as if you are
not 'changing' anything in an existing setup, people are less afraid that
things might go terribly wrong. That's the reason we have ltsp on a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 04:40:31PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:38 PM, David Van Asschedvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a good point, and I understand the thinking behind it, as if
you are not 'changing' anything in
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 18:43, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
It sound like another great, low impact (I am trying to think of a term
like 'carbon foot print' to properly reflect the impact) way of
bringing LTSP into the class room.
polite or gentle perhaps?
or non-invasive?
12 matches
Mail list logo
