...@lists.sugarlabs.org
sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org, Gonzalo Odiard
godi...@sugarlabs.org,Sugar Labs Systems
syst...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] This list in need YOUR help
Message-ID: 20150329200637.gb10...@us.netrek.org
Content-Type: text/plain
...@lists.sugarlabs.org
sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org, Sugar Labs Systems
syst...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] This list in need YOUR help
Message-ID: 551850d3.6050...@fuentelibre.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 02:21:55PM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote:
There is a number of reasons a message could wind up in the
moderation queue.
If it is over 256k.
As list post volume has fallen, and cost per byte has fallen, I
propose you double or quadruple that limit. As consequence, the
There is a number of reasons a message could wind up in the moderation
queue.
If it is over 256k. If you send it from a different address than the one
you are subscribed.
The one that bit me, was that mailman thought my email was some kind of
administrative email (subscription request or
Are all the mail moderated or only mail from who is not in the list?
Gonzalo
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org
wrote:
Hello members of IAEP and Sugar-devel :
It looks like both of these lists have been without an active mantainer
for some time. I
