Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

English idioms"! > > thanks > Hilary > > ---Original Message--- > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:06:09 +1000 > From: James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> > To: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org, sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

28 Sep 2017 09:06:09 +1000 > From: James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> > To: [2]iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org, [3]sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - > Sugar Labs > > Long reply. > > I'm very familiar with

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

7 09:06:09 +1000 From: James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> To: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org, sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs Long reply. I'm very familiar with the geek feminism team and the conference anti-har

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:03:17PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote: > > 2017-09-27 13:03 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender <[1]walter.ben...@gmail.com>: > > FWIW, the current Sugar Labs code of conduct is available in the wiki > here: > >

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

2017-09-27 13:03 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender : > FWIW, the current Sugar Labs code of conduct is available in the wiki here: > > https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Legal/Code_of_Conduct > > And translated into Spanish here: > >

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

Long reply. I'm very familiar with the geek feminism team and the conference anti-harassment policy, as I've been a regular speaker at linux.conf.au. I support the work of the geek feminism team. For my part, two of my friends who are female are part of the overall geek feminism movement. The

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

FWIW, the current Sugar Labs code of conduct is available in the wiki here: https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Legal/Code_of_Conduct And translated into Spanish here: http://co.sugarlabs.org/go/C%C3%B3digo_de_Conducta @Laura, maybe you could explain why you think the current code of

[IAEP] Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

Hello all, Hola a todos, [Thanks in advance to volunteer translators of this message] I would like to propose a Motion for: "The Sugar Labs Code of Conduct to include the Geek Feminism Community anti-harassment Policy and to

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct

Ana, You did a wonderful thing leading the effort to translate my book into Spanish. That book has been downloaded 394 times from archive.org and is even available in printed form now. After all that work if you want to rest on your laurels for awhile nobody will hold it against you. I haven't

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct

On my experience inside a classroom the less you demand the less you get, and children feel stimulated and encouraged by challenges. I really don 't believe that laurels or emeritus rights are any good at all. ( I think only very extraordinary contributions deserve to be taken that way ) Having

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct

I personally read the code minutes after you sent the mail, I thought it was important and interesting. In fact I forwarded it immediately to people from the local (uruguay) ubuntu group that also enjoyed the link, and had the chance to read it and to share it and to talk about it on the Flisol

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct

And one more thing... Regarding Sugar using the same code I keep silence because, I am really out of the community for this 2012 I am not teaching on 1:1 project that got me into sugar, and maybe never again i will teach that level , so I wonder if it is right for outsiders like me to give

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct

On 12-04-28 at 07:13am, Walter Bender wrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 23:59 -0700, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Ubuntu is refreshing its Code of Conduct:  

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 23:59 -0700, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Ubuntu is refreshing its Code of Conduct:

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct

On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 23:59 -0700, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Ubuntu is refreshing its Code of Conduct: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sabdfl/ubuntu-codeofconduct/v2-draft/view/head:/MergedCodeOfConduct.txt Although I've never participated much in the Ubuntu community, I've always thought

Re: [IAEP] Code of Conduct

Thanks Bernie! A bit too long, but more concrete than the thoughtful but high-falutin' http://openRespect.org :-) On 4/28/2012 12:38 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 23:59 -0700, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Ubuntu is refreshing its Code of Conduct:

[IAEP] Code of Conduct

Ubuntu is refreshing its Code of Conduct: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sabdfl/ubuntu-codeofconduct/v2-draft/view/head:/MergedCodeOfConduct.txt Although I've never participated much in the Ubuntu community, I've always thought of this document as one the best of its kind. Should we publish a